Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e027445.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445.

Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper

Affiliations
Review

Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper

Brian S Alper et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is used to assess and report certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. This GRADE concept article is not GRADE guidance but introduces certainty of net benefit, defined as the certainty that the balance between desirable and undesirable health effects is favourable. Determining certainty of net benefit requires considering certainty of effect estimates, the expected importance of outcomes and variability in importance, and the interaction of these concepts. Certainty of net harm is the certainty that the net effect is unfavourable. Guideline panels using or testing this approach might limit strong recommendations to actions with a high certainty of net benefit or against actions with a moderate or high certainty of net harm. Recommendations may differ in direction or strength from that suggested by the certainty of net benefit or harm when influenced by cost, equity, acceptability or feasibility.

Keywords: clinical decision making; decision analysis; evidence synthesis; evidence-based medicine; guideline development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors are members of the GRADE Working Group and conduct scholarly activity or professional services related to the concepts in this article. BSA and PO are employed by EBSCO Information Services and IK is employed by Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Certainty across the evidence-to-decision framework*.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A stepwise approach to determining the certainty of the net effect estimate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Classification of precision of net effect estimate.

References

    1. www.gradeworkinggroup.org [Accessed 27 Nov 2016].
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. . GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:401–6. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hultcrantz M, Rind D, Akl EA, et al. . The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;87:4–13. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. . GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:726–35. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources