Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;40(13):3982-4000.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24682. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

Modeling longitudinal imaging biomarkers with parametric Bayesian multi-task learning

Affiliations

Modeling longitudinal imaging biomarkers with parametric Bayesian multi-task learning

Leon M Aksman et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Longitudinal imaging biomarkers are invaluable for understanding the course of neurodegeneration, promising the ability to track disease progression and to detect disease earlier than cross-sectional biomarkers. To properly realize their potential, biomarker trajectory models must be robust to both under-sampling and measurement errors and should be able to integrate multi-modal information to improve trajectory inference and prediction. Here we present a parametric Bayesian multi-task learning based approach to modeling univariate trajectories across subjects that addresses these criteria. Our approach learns multiple subjects' trajectories within a single model that allows for different types of information sharing, that is, coupling, across subjects. It optimizes a combination of uncoupled, fully coupled and kernel coupled models. Kernel-based coupling allows linking subjects' trajectories based on one or more biomarker measures. We demonstrate this using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data, where we model longitudinal trajectories of MRI-derived cortical volumes in neurodegeneration, with coupling based on APOE genotype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and amyloid PET-based biomarkers. In addition to detecting established disease effects, we detect disease related changes within the insula that have not received much attention within the literature. Due to its sensitivity in detecting disease effects, its competitive predictive performance and its ability to learn the optimal parameter covariance from data rather than choosing a specific set of random and fixed effects a priori, we propose that our model can be used in place of or in addition to linear mixed effects models when modeling biomarker trajectories. A software implementation of the method is publicly available.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Bayesian analysis; biomarkers; longitudinal analysis; machine learning; multimodal analysis; structural MRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top row: One run of the simulation of 200 subjects' longitudinal samples with group differences in intercept at four different measurement noise (σm) levels. Bottom row: The same with group differences in slope. Each subject has three samples, with trajectory parameters chosen from among five gradations of intercept (top row) or slope (bottom row), indicated by different colors [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of log mean absolute errors (MAEs) of predictions of all models across all simulations runs for the two scenarios: intercept variation (top row) and slope variation (bottom row) for four levels of measurement noise (σm). Models with oracle‐like prior information are marked with an asterisk (top row: "int" models; bottom row: "slope" models) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots of parameter coverage probabilities (i.e., fractions of times the true parameter value fell within the posterior credible region) and log mean absolute errors (MAE) between estimated and actual parameters for the two scenarios: intercept variation (top row) and slope variation (bottom row) for four measurement noise levels (σm). Models with oracle‐like prior information are marked with an asterisk (top row: "int" models; bottom row: "slope" models) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Top: True and estimated annualized rates of change across cortex for four representative MTL models bottom: MAEs of estimates. MAE, mean absolute error [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Log Bayes factors across cortex, comparing each biomarker‐coupled MTL model to “random” [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 6
Figure 6
Top: Significance of (cross‐sectional) diagnostic group differences in predicted volume at mean baseline age (73.5 years) for OLS, LME, and selected MTL models bottom: same for (longitudinal) group differences in estimated slopes [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Abadi, M. , Barham, P. , Chen, J. , Chen, Z. , Davis, A. , Dean, J. , Devin, M. , Ghemawat, S. , Irving, G. , Isard, M. , Kudlur, M. , Levenberg, J. , Monga, R. , Moore, S. , Murray, D.G. , Steiner, B. , Tucker, P. , Vasudevan, V. , Warden, P. , Wicke, M. , Yu, Y. , Zheng, X. , 2016. TensorFlow: A system for large‐scale machine learning.
    1. Arbabshirani, M. R. , Plis, S. , Sui, J. , & Calhoun, V. D. (2016). Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls. NeuroImage, 145, 137–165. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernal‐Rusiel, J. L. , Greve, D. N. , Reuter, M. , Fischl, B. , Sabuncu, M. R. , & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative . (2013). Statistical analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data with linear mixed effects models. NeuroImage, 66, 249–260. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernal‐Rusiel, J. L. , Reuter, M. , Greve, D. N. , Fischl, B. , & Sabuncu, M. R. (2013). Spatiotemporal linear mixed effects modeling for the mass‐univariate analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data. NeuroImage, 81, 358–370. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.049 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop, C. M. (2007). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.

Publication types