Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 29;42(1):e1-e9.
doi: 10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1901.

Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review

Affiliations
Review

Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review

Winnie T Maphumulo et al. Curationis. .

Abstract

Background: There is overwhelming evidence that the quality of health care in South Africa has been compromised by various challenges that impact negatively on healthcare quality. Improvement in quality care means fewer errors, reduced delays in care delivery, improvement in efficiency, increased market share and lower cost. Decline in quality health care has caused the public to lose trust in the healthcare system in South Africa.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify challenges that are being incurred in practice that compromise quality in the healthcare sector, including strategies employed by government to improve the quality of health delivery.

Method: Literature search included the following computer-assisted databases and bibliographies: Medline (Medical Literature Online), EBSCOhost, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. Furthermore, websites were used to source policy documents of organisations such as the National Department of Health in South Africa and the World Health Organization.

Results: Seventy-four articles were selected from 1366 retrieved. These articles quantify problems facing quality care delivery and strategies used to improve the healthcare system in South Africa.

Conclusion: The findings revealed that there were many quality improvement programmes that had been initiated, adapted, modified and then tested but did not produce the required level of quality service delivery as desired. As a result, the Government of South Africa has a challenge to ensure that implementation of National Core Standards will deliver the desired health outcomes, because achieving a lasting quality improvement system in health care seems to be an arduous challenge.

Keywords: South Africa; challenges in healthcare; healthcare system; lack of resources; quality service delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of data collection process and applied inclusion criteria.

References

    1. Adejumo O. & Archibong U, 2013, ‘Affirmative action in South Africa: Are we creating new casualties?’, Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture 3, 14–27. 10.1002/jpoc.21073 - DOI
    1. Alves J., Peralta S. & Perelman J, 2013, ‘Efficiency and equity consequences of decentralization in health: An economic perspective’, Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 31, 74–83. 10.1016/j.rpsp.2013.01.002 - DOI
    1. Baker P, 2010, ‘From apartheid to neoliberalism: Health equity in post-apartheid South Africa’, International Journal of Health Services 40, 79–95. - PubMed
    1. Barron P. & Padarath A, 2017, Twenty years of the South African Health Review, South African Health Review 2017, Health Systems Trust, Durban.
    1. Burger R. & Jafta R, 2010, Affirmative action in South Africa: An empirical assessment of the impact on labour market outcomes Crise Working Paper No. 76, Crise working paper, Stellenbosch University, Stellenboch.