Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1309-x.

Ablative radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: techniques and results

Affiliations
Review

Ablative radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: techniques and results

Marsha Reyngold et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Standard doses of conventionally fractionated radiation have had minimal to no impact on the survival duration of patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The use of low-dose stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) in 3- to 5-fractionshas thus far produced a modest improvement in median survival with minimal toxicity and shorter duration of treatment, but failed to produce a meaningful difference at 2 years and beyond. A much higher biologically effective dose (BED) is likely needed to achieve tumor ablation The challenge is the delivery of ablative doses near the very sensitive gastrointestinal tract. Advanced organ motion management, image guidance, and adaptive planning techniques enable delivery of ablative doses of radiation (> = 100Gy BED) when more protracted hypofractionated regimens or advanced image guidance and adaptive planning are used. This approach has resulted in encouraging improvements in survival in several studies. This review will summarize the evolution of the radiation technique over time from conventional to ablative and describe the practical aspects of delivering ablative doses near the GI tract using cone beam CT image (CBCT) guidance and online adaptive MRI guidance.

Keywords: Ablative radiation; CBCT guided radiation therapy; Hypofractionated ablative radiation; IGRT; MRI guided radiation therapy; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PJP receives clinical trial funding from Viewray, Inc.; CHC and MR declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contouring and plan evaluation. a and c Simulation CTs showing GTV (cyan), PTV high dose (red) and PTV microscopic dose (yellow) as well as stomach (orange) with a carve-out structure (brown) used to ensure exclusion of stomach from PTV high dose as demonstrated by the white arrow. b and d Dose distributions with the lowest displayed dose set to the critical max point dose for stomach (60Gy). White arrow indicates that 60Gy isodose line is away from the surface of the stomach, which was achieved by creating a PRV (not shown). c and d An example that includes an optional PTV ultra-high dose (magenta)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CBCTs are used verify the target position as well as day-to-day variation in the position of the adjacent luminal GI tract. Simulation CTs of two patients displaying the critical max point dose for stomach (yellow) (a) and small bowel (magenta) (c). Corresponding DIBH CBCT images displaying the same isodose lines (b and d) are shown to the right. Stomach position may be affected by filling with food and air (a and b), while the duodenum is very reproducible (c and d)

References

    1. Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, Marthey L, Faris JE, Mellon EA, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):801–810. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00172-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Fu B, Yachida S, Luo M, Abe H, Henderson CM, et al. DPC4 gene status of the primary carcinoma correlates with patterns of failure in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1806–1813. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7188. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crane Christopher H., Varadhachary Gauri R., Yordy John S., Staerkel Gregg A., Javle Milind M., Safran Howard, Haque Waqar, Hobbs Bridgett D., Krishnan Sunil, Fleming Jason B., Das Prajnan, Lee Jeffrey E., Abbruzzese James L., Wolff Robert A. Phase II Trial of Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Chemoradiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced (T4) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation ofSmad4(Dpc4)Immunostaining With Pattern of Disease Progression. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29(22):3037–3043. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anonymous Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(10):751–755. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.10.751. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, Rougier P, Mariette C, Bouche O, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592–1599. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn281. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms