How many older adults receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit near the end of life? A cohort study
- PMID: 31172885
- PMCID: PMC6691599
- DOI: 10.1177/0269216319854013
How many older adults receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit near the end of life? A cohort study
Abstract
Background: The high burden of disease-oriented drugs among older adults with limited life expectancy raises important questions about the potential futility of care.
Aim: To describe the use of drugs of questionable clinical benefit during the last 3 months of life of older adults who died from life-limiting conditions.
Design: Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of decedents. Death certificate data were linked to administrative and healthcare registries with national coverage in Sweden.
Setting: Older adults (≥75 years) who died from conditions potentially amenable to palliative care between 1 January and 31 December 2015 in Sweden. We identified drugs of questionable clinical benefit from a set of consensus-based criteria.
Results: A total of 58,415 decedents were included (mean age, 87.0 years). During their last 3 months of life, they received on average 8.9 different drugs. Overall, 32.0% of older adults continued and 14.0% initiated at least one drug of questionable clinical benefit (e.g. statins, calcium supplements, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, antidementia drugs). These proportions were highest among younger individuals (i.e. aged 75-84 years), among people who died from organ failure and among those with a large number of coexisting chronic conditions. Excluding people who died from acute and potentially unpredictable fatal events had little influence on the results.
Conclusion: A substantial share of older persons with life-limiting diseases receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit during their last months of life. Adequate training, guidance and resources are needed to rationalize and deprescribe drug treatments for older adults near the end of life.
Keywords: Drug utilization; cohort studies; deprescriptions; drug therapy; frail elderly; geriatrics; inappropriate prescribing; palliative care.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Healthcare professionals must communicate with patients and relatives. They must enable informed, realistic and appropriate decisions in end-of-life pharmacotherapy.Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Jan;24(1):12. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103179. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Evid Based Nurs. 2021. PMID: 31719127 No abstract available.
References
-
- Rosella L, Kornas K, Huang A, et al. Accumulation of chronic conditions at the time of death increased in Ontario from 1994 to 2013. Health Aff 2018; 37(3): 464–472. - PubMed
-
- Morin L, Vetrano DL, Rizzuto D, et al. Choosing wisely ? measuring the burden of medications in older adults near the end of life: nationwide, longitudinal cohort study. Am J Med 2017; 130(8): 927–936. e9. - PubMed
-
- Wastesson JW, Morin L, Tan ECK, et al. An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17(12): 1185–1196. - PubMed
-
- Reeve E, Wiese MD, Mangoni AA. Alterations in drug disposition in older adults. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2015; 11(4): 491–508. - PubMed
-
- Franken LG, de Winter BC, van Esch HJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic considerations and recommendations in palliative care, with focus on morphine, midazolam and haloperidol. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 12(6): 669–680. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
