Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 21;14(2):95-101.
doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.11. eCollection 2019 May.

Thrombus Embolisation: Prevention is Better than Cure

Affiliations
Review

Thrombus Embolisation: Prevention is Better than Cure

Fizzah A Choudry et al. Interv Cardiol. .

Abstract

Thrombus embolisation complicating primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. However, there are currently no proven recommendations for intervention in the setting of large thrombus burden. In this review, we discuss the clinical implications of thrombus embolisation and angiographic predictors of embolisation, and provide an update of current evidence for some preventative strategies, both pharmacological and mechanical, in this setting.

Keywords: Percutaneous coronary intervention; embolisation; thrombus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Case of Thrombus Embolisation
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Proposed Algorithm for Primary PCI in the Presence of Large Thrombus Burden

References

    1. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Luca G, van’t Hof AWJ, Ottervanger JP et al. Unsuccessful reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2005;150:557–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brener SJ et al. Insights into the pathophysiology of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;151:S4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirtane AJ, Sandhu P, Mehran R et al. Association between intraprocedural thrombotic events and adverse outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (a Harmonizing Outcomes With RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] Substudy) Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.034. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources