Comparison between monitored anesthesia care and general anesthesia in patients undergoing device closure of atrial septal defect
- PMID: 31179084
- PMCID: PMC6531709
- DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.56
Comparison between monitored anesthesia care and general anesthesia in patients undergoing device closure of atrial septal defect
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) device closure is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) because it can ensure protection of the airway from the effects of insertion of the transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion. However, recent studies have suggested that this procedure can be performed safely under deep sedation also. Thus, we compared the efficacy of using monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with deep sedation versus GA to perform this procedure and the post-procedural outcomes and incidence of complications associated with these two methods of anesthesia.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed cases involving 311 patients who underwent ASD device closures from January 2011 to December 2015. The demographics, laboratory values, echocardiographic findings, and intraoperative data of these patients were assessed. GA was induced with a continuous infusion of propofol and remifentanil using a target control infusion pump. MAC with deep sedation was performed by using a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. The primary outcome of the study was the overall complication rate that included the incidence of aspiration pneumonia, sore throat, dysphagia, vocal cord palsy, neurologic complication, device-related complications, and other minor complications during the procedure; and the secondary outcomes were the turnover time, procedure time, and duration of hospital stay.
Results: No significant differences were observed in the complication rate and length of the hospital stay between the MAC group and the GA group. However, the turnover time was significantly longer in the GA group than in the MAC group (56.2±13.3 vs. 51.0±15.4 min, P=0.004).
Conclusions: MAC under deep sedation is an effective and safe anesthetic option comparable to GA for performing percutaneous ASD device closures.
Keywords: Atrial septal defects (ASD); deep sedation; dexmedetomidine; general anesthesia (GA).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects in spontaneously breathing children under deep sedation: a feasible and safe concept.Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):215-22. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0762-9. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 23897322
-
Propofol/dexmedetomidine and propofol/ketamine combinations for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a prospective randomized study.Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.010. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20435239 Clinical Trial.
-
Appropriate selection of echocardiographic guidance for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;36(5):855-863. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01778-9. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32040685
-
Impact of Percutaneous Closure of Interatrial Shunts on Migraine Attacks: Single-Operator Series and Review of the Literature.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12(2):129-138. doi: 10.2174/1574887112666170328124939. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28356032 Review.
-
General Anesthesia and Deep Sedation for Dental Treatments in Children: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Mar 6. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Mar 6. PMID: 29298004 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A prospective study of various anesthetic techniques in patients with acyanotic congenital heart diseases undergoing device closure.Ann Card Anaesth. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):441-446. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_59_21. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 36254908 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jan 14;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-1071-z. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31937330 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Calvert PA, Klein AA. Anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain 2008;8:16-20. 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkm046 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources