Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 24:6:157.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00157. eCollection 2019.

Applications of Microbiome Analyses in Alternative Poultry Broiler Production Systems

Affiliations
Review

Applications of Microbiome Analyses in Alternative Poultry Broiler Production Systems

Zhaohao Shi et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

While most of the focus on poultry microbiome research has been directed toward conventional poultry production, there is increasing interest in characterizing microbial populations originating from alternative or non-conventional poultry production. This is in part due to the growing general popularity in locally produced foods and more specifically the attractiveness of free-range or pasture raised poultry. Most of the focus of microbiome characterization in pasture flock birds has been on live bird production, primarily on the gastrointestinal tract. Interest in environmental impacts on production responses and management strategies have been key factors for comparative microbiome studies. This has important ramifications since these birds are not only raised under different conditions, but the grower cycle can be longer and in some cases slower growing breeds used. The impact of different feed additives is also of interest with some microbiome-based studies having examined the effect of feeding these additives to birds grown under pasture flock conditions. In the future, microbiome research approaches offer unique opportunities to develop better live bird management strategies and design optimal feed additive approaches for pasture flock poultry production systems.

Keywords: feed additive; gastrointestinal tract; microbiome; pasture flock; preharvest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gifford K, Bernard JC. The effect of information on consumers' willingness to pay for natural and organic chicken. Int J Consum Stud. (2011) 35:282–9. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00929.x - DOI
    1. Rainey R, Crandall PG, O'Bryan CA, Ricke SC, Pendleton S, Seideman S. Marketing locally produced organic foods in three metro Arkansas farmers markets: consumer opinions and food safety concerns. J Agric Food Info. (2011) 12:141–53. 10.1080/10496505.2011.563223 - DOI
    1. O'Bryan CA, Crandall PG, Davis ML, Kostadini G, Gibson KE, Alali WQ, et al. Mobile poultry processing units: a safe and cost-effective poultry processing option for the small-scale farmer in the United States. World J Poult Sci. (2014) 70:787–802. 10.1017/S0043933914000853 - DOI
    1. Luján-Rhenals D, Morawicki R, Van Loo EJ, Ricke SC. Chapter 19. Energy and water use in poultry processing. In: Ricke SC. editor. Achieving Sustainable Production of Poultry Meat- Volume 1 Safety, Quality and Sustainability. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodd Publishing; (2017).p. 389–409.
    1. Luján-Rhenals D, Morawicki R, Van Loo EJ, Ricke SC. Chapter 20. Waste management and emissions in poultry processing. In: Ricke SC. editor. Achieving Sustainable Production of Poultry Meat- Volume 1 Safety, Quality and Sustainability. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodd Publishing; (2017). p. 411–31.

LinkOut - more resources