Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 11;11(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0201-z.

Patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of physiotherapy services in the emergency department: a qualitative systematic review

Rosalie Barrett  1 , Louise Terry  2
Affiliations
Review

Patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of physiotherapy services in the emergency department: a qualitative systematic review

Rosalie Barrett et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, emergency department (ED) attendances and admissions to acute care have increased significantly. Many EDs are adding physiotherapists to their team thereby allowing doctors to see more cases that are 'urgent'. This is a move away from the 'traditional' physiotherapy service whereby the ED team refers patients to an outpatient physiotherapy service sometimes resulting in significant delays. Internationally, there is no agreed consensus on the role or value of ED-based physiotherapists.

Aim: The objective of this review was to retrieve, critically appraise and synthesise the evidence from studies relating to patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences and/or perceptions of physiotherapy services in the ED.

Method: This is a systematic review (SR) synthesising qualitative studies, which have considered patients' (population 1) and healthcare professionals' (population 2) experiences and/or perceptions (outcomes) of ED physiotherapy services (exposure). A comprehensive systematic search, limited to English language articles, was undertaken on seven electronic medical databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, BNI, PubMed and PEDro) for the period January 2006 to October 2016. Grey literature was identified using Google Scholar, reference lists and website searching. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative checklist was used to appraise all included studies. All studies were data extracted and quality appraised by two reviewers to enhance rigour and reduce bias.

Results: A total of 2163 studies were screened, 10 received full-text review and 7 studies were included in the final review. Six of the studies originated in Australia and one from the USA. The themes that emerged were as follows: Patients and healthcare professionals view ED-based physiotherapists as having (1) expert clinical skills and (2) an educational role. There is role confusion and lack of integration of the ED-based physiotherapist within the ED team.

Conclusion: This review adds an in-depth human perspective to the current ED physiotherapy literature, which provides insight into how ED healthcare services and physiotherapy services specifically should be developed and delivered in the future. The knowledge from this review has implications for future education programmes, as well as development of both new care pathways and physiotherapy clinical roles. Research into ED-based physiotherapy services is predominantly quantitative. Despite the newness of the ED physiotherapy role, this review reveals that the provision of physiotherapists within EDs contributes value to both patients and staff. However, the dominance of Australian research means it is uncertain how it translates to the UK or elsewhere. There needs to be further UK-based research.

Keywords: Emergency department; Experiences; Perceptions; Physiotherapy; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Taylor Nicholas F., Norman Emily, Roddy Leanne, Tang Clarice, Pagram Anne, Hearn Kirsty. Primary contact physiotherapy in emergency departments can reduce length of stay for patients with peripheral musculoskeletal injuries compared with secondary contact physiotherapy: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(2):107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kilner E. What evidence is there that a physiotherapy service in the emergency department improves health outcomes? A systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011;16(1):51–58. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nall C. Primary care physiotherapy in the emergency department. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(1):70. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70072-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bethel J. The role of the physiotherapist practitioner in emergency departments: a critical appraisal. Emerg Nurs. 2005;13(2):26–31. doi: 10.7748/en2005.05.13.2.26.c1185. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anaf S, Sheppard LA. Physiotherapy as a clinical service in emergency departments: a narrative review. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(4):243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2007.04.006. - DOI