Evaluating the impact of emergency department crowding on disposition patterns and outcomes of discharged patients
- PMID: 31179922
- PMCID: PMC6354348
- DOI: 10.1186/s12245-019-0223-1
Evaluating the impact of emergency department crowding on disposition patterns and outcomes of discharged patients
Abstract
Background: Crowding is a major challenge faced by EDs and is associated with poor outcomes.
Objectives: Determine the effect of high ED occupancy on disposition decisions, return ED visits, and hospitalizations.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records of patients evaluated at an adult, urban, and academic ED over 20 months between the years 2012 and 2014. Using a logistic regression model predicting admission, we obtained estimates of the effect of high occupancy on admission disposition, adjusted for key covariates. We then stratified the analysis based on the presence or absence of high boarder patient counts.
Results: Disposition decisions during a high occupancy hour decreased the odds of admission (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: [0.89, 0.98]). Among those who were not admitted, high occupancy was not associated with increased odds of return in the combined (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.02]), with-boarders (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: [0.86, 1.09]), and no-boarders samples (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: [0.83, 1.04]). Among those who were not admitted and who did return within 14 days, disposition during a high occupancy hour on the initial ED visit was not associated with a significant increased odds of hospitalization in the combined (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.24]), the with-boarders (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.44]), and the no-boarders samples (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: [0.77, 1.24]).
Conclusion: ED crowding was associated with reduced likelihood of hospitalization without increased likelihood of 2-week return ED visit or hospitalization. Furthermore, high occupancy disposition hours with high boarder patient counts were associated with decreased likelihood of hospitalization.
Keywords: Disposition decision-making; Emergency department crowding; Outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2007 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010;26:1–31. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
