Electroosmotic flow velocity in DNA modified nanochannels
- PMID: 31181468
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.002
Electroosmotic flow velocity in DNA modified nanochannels
Abstract
Electroosmotic flow (EOF) is systematically investigated in DNA grafted hard PDMS (h-PDMS) channels with size ranging from 50 nm to 2.5 μm by using the current-slope method. The effects of the DNA types, the incubation time in the process of surface modification, and the pH value, ionic concentration of electrolyte solutions, and the UV (ultraviolet) illumination on the velocity of electroosmotic flow are experimentally studied. It is found that the DNA type and the incubation time of DNAs affect the grafting density and the surface charge on the channel walls, thus influencing the EOF velocity. In the DNA modified channels, the pH effects on EOF velocity become less prominent compared with that in the pristine channels. On the contrary, UV illumination can increase the EOF velocity significantly in the DNA modified channels, whereas takes unapparent effects on EOF velocity in the pristine channels. The effects of ionic concentration on EOF are also studied in this paper. It is observed that EOF velocity is dependent on the channel size when the ionic concentration is low even without overlapped electric double layer (EDL) and is essentially independent of the channel size when the ionic concentration is high. Furthermore, with high ionic concentration and thin EDL, the EOF velocity can be enhanced by the coated DNA brushes on the channel surface.
Keywords: Electric double layer; Electroosmotic flow; Nanochannel; Surface modification.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effects of ion size, ion valence and pH of electrolyte solutions on EOF velocity in single nanochannels.Anal Chim Acta. 2019 Jun 20;1059:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 19. Anal Chim Acta. 2019. PMID: 30876634
-
Electroosmotic flow in single PDMS nanochannels.Nanoscale. 2016 Jun 16;8(24):12237-46. doi: 10.1039/c6nr02937j. Nanoscale. 2016. PMID: 27256765
-
Alternating current electroosmotic flow in polyelectrolyte-grafted nanochannel.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016 Nov 1;147:234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.064. Epub 2016 Aug 1. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016. PMID: 27518455
-
The Electroosmotic Flow (EOF).Methods Mol Biol. 2010;583:121-34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-106-6_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2010. PMID: 19763462 Review.
-
Electroosmotic flow: From microfluidics to nanofluidics.Electrophoresis. 2021 Apr;42(7-8):834-868. doi: 10.1002/elps.202000313. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Electrophoresis. 2021. PMID: 33382088 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Label-Free Detections for Nanofluidic Analytical Devices.Micromachines (Basel). 2020 Sep 23;11(10):885. doi: 10.3390/mi11100885. Micromachines (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32977690 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-monotonic variation of flow strength in nanochannels grafted with end-charged polyelectrolyte layers.RSC Adv. 2022 Feb 2;12(7):4061-4071. doi: 10.1039/d1ra06601c. eCollection 2022 Jan 28. RSC Adv. 2022. PMID: 35425443 Free PMC article.
-
Transdermal electroosmotic flow generated by a porous microneedle array patch.Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 28;12(1):658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20948-4. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 33510169 Free PMC article.
-
Local nano-electrode fabrication utilizing nanofluidic and nano-electrochemical control.Electrophoresis. 2024 Dec;45(23-24):2076-2081. doi: 10.1002/elps.202300002. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Electrophoresis. 2024. PMID: 38962855 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources