Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Jun 18;8(12):e013067.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013067. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

Targeting an Ischemic Time <120 Minutes in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
Editorial

Targeting an Ischemic Time <120 Minutes in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Matthew Henderson et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Editorials; door‐to‐balloon; fibrinolysis; myocardial infarction; primary angioplasty; symptom‐to‐balloon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two patients with similar presentations of STEMI. Both patients had Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 0 flow in the left anterior descending artery (yellow arrows), with Rentrop 0 collateral flow. Both patients were treated according to guidelines. A, Patient with transmural infarct and microvascular obstruction. Symptom‐to‐balloon time was 163 minutes. LGE imaging demonstrated infarct size of 25% of the left ventricle. Microvascular obstruction was present at 8% of the left ventricle. Myocardial salvage index was 30%. This patient also had myocardial hemorrhage acutely that persisted as myocardial iron at a 6‐month follow‐up CMR (not shown). This patient was rehospitalized with new‐onset heart failure. B, Patient without transmural infarct and no microvascular obstruction. Symptom‐to‐balloon time was 87 minutes. LGE imaging demonstrated infarct size of 16% of the left ventricle. Myocardial salvage index was 52%. This patient had an uncomplicated clinical course. CMR indicates cardiac magnetic resonance; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; STEMI, ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction.

Comment on

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli‐Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P; ESC Scientific Document Group . ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation. The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. - PubMed
    1. Francone M, Bucciarelli‐Ducci C, Carbone I, Canali E, Scardala R, Calabrese FA, Sardella G, Mancone M, Catalano C, Fedele F, Passariello R, Bogaert J, Agati L. Impact of primary coronary angioplasty delay on myocardial salvage, infarct size, and microvascular damage in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2145–2153. - PubMed
    1. Reimer KA, Jennings RB. The “wavefront phenomenon” of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow. Lab Invest. 1979;40:633–644. - PubMed
    1. Carrick D, Haig C, Rauhalammi S, Ahmed N, Mordi I, McEntegart M, Petrie MC, Eteiba H, Hood S, Watkins S, Lindsay M, Mahrous A, Ford I, Tzemos N, Sattar N, Welsh P, Radjenovic A, Oldroyd KG, Berry C. Prognostic significance of infarct core pathology revealed by quantitative non‐contrast in comparison with contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in reperfused ST‐elevation myocardial infarction survivors. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1044–1059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn KT, Song YB, Choe YH, Yang JH, Hahn J‐Y, Choi J‐H, Choi S‐H, Chang S‐A, Lee S‐C, Lee SH, Oh JK, Gwon H‐C. Impact of transmural necrosis on left ventricular remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:835–842. - PubMed