Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):364.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1.

Modes of e-Health delivery in secondary prevention programmes for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review

Gunhild Brørs  1   2 , Trond Røed Pettersen  3 , Tina B Hansen  4   5 , Bengt Fridlund  3   6 , Linn Benjaminsen Hølvold  7 , Hans Lund  8 , Tone M Norekvål  9   10   11
Affiliations

Modes of e-Health delivery in secondary prevention programmes for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review

Gunhild Brørs et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic health (e-Health) interventions are emerging as an effective alternative model for improving secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of different modes of delivery and components in e-Health secondary prevention programmes on adherence to treatment, modifiable CAD risk factors and psychosocial outcomes for patients with CAD.

Method: A systematic review was carried out based on articles found in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase. Studies evaluating secondary prevention e-Health programmes provided through mobile-Health (m-Health), web-based technology or a combination of m-Health and web-based technology were eligible. The main outcomes measured were adherence to treatment, modifiable CAD risk factors and psychosocial outcomes. The quality appraisal of the studies included was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for RCT. The results were synthesised narratively.

Result: A total of 4834 titles were identified and 1350 were screened for eligibility. After reviewing 123 articles in full, 24 RCTs including 3654 participants with CAD were included. Eight studies delivered secondary prevention programmes through m-Health, nine through web-based technology, and seven studies used a combination of m-Health and web-based technology. The majority of studies employed two or three secondary prevention components, of which health education was employed in 21 studies. The m-Health programmes reported positive effects on adherence to medication. Most studies evaluating web-based technology programmes alone or in combination with m-Health also utilised traditional CR, and reported improved modifiable CAD risk factors. The quality appraisal showed a moderate methodological quality of the studies.

Conclusion: Evidence exists that supports the use of e-Health interventions for improving secondary prevention of CAD. However, a comparison across studies highlighted a wide variability of components and outcomes within the different modes of delivery. High quality trials are needed to define the most efficient mode of delivery and components capable of addressing a favourable outcome for patients.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; E-health; M-health; Secondary prevention programme; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data selection process and results based on the PRISMA statement [14]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationships within and between studies on various modes of delivery, components and significant effect on outcomes of the evaluated studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P, Sullivan F, Detmer D, Kahan JP, Oortwijn W, MacGillivray S. What is eHealth (4): A scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:1–e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frederix I, Caiani EG, Dendale P, Anker S, Bax J, Bohm A, Cowie M, Crawford J, de Groot N, Dilaveris P, et al. ESC e-cardiology working group position paper: overcoming challenges in digital health implementation in cardiovascular medicine. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. 10.1177/2047487319832394. - PubMed
    1. Cowie MR, Bax J, Bruining N, Cleland JG, Koehler F, Malik M, Pinto F, van der Velde E, Vardas P. e-health: A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(1):63–66. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corra U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Ryden L, Jennings C, Gyberg V, Amouyel P, Bruthans J, Castro Conde A, et al. EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(6):636–648. doi: 10.1177/2047487315569401. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types