The effects of spinal manipulation on performance-related outcomes in healthy asymptomatic adult population: a systematic review of best evidence
- PMID: 31183076
- PMCID: PMC6555009
- DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0246-y
The effects of spinal manipulation on performance-related outcomes in healthy asymptomatic adult population: a systematic review of best evidence
Abstract
Introduction: The effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for improving athletic performance in healthy athletes is unclear. Assessing the effect of SMT on other performance outcomes in asymptomatic populations may provide insight into the management of athletes where direct evidence may not be available. Our objective was to systematically review the literature on the effect of SMT on performance-related outcomes in asymptomatic adults.
Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from 1990 to March 23, 2018. Inclusion criteria was any study examining a performance-related outcome of SMT in asymptomatic adults. Methodological quality was assessed using the SIGN criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were considered scientifically admissible for a best evidence synthesis. We calculated the between group mean change and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Of 1415 articles screened, 20 studies had low risk of bias, seven were randomized crossover trials, 10 were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and three were RCT pilot trials. Four studies showed SMT had no effect on physiological parameters at rest or during exercise. There was no effect of SMT on scapular kinematics or transversus abdominus thickness. Three studies identified changes in muscle activation of the upper or lower limb, compared to two that did not. Five studies showed changes in range of motion (ROM). One study showed an increase lumbar proprioception and two identified changes in baropodometric variables after SMT. Sport-specific studies show no effect of SMT except for a small increase in basketball free-throw accuracy.
Conclusion: The preponderance of evidence suggests that SMT in comparison to sham or other interventions does not enhance performance-based outcomes in asymptomatic adult population. All studies are exploratory with immediate effects. In the few studies suggesting a positive immediate effect, the importance of such change is uncertain. Further high-quality performance specific studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.
Keywords: Asymptomatic; Athlete; Healthy; Performance; Spinal manipulation; Sport.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThis article was commissioned and peer reviewed.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The global summit on the efficacy and effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for the prevention and treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature.Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Feb 17;29(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00362-9. Chiropr Man Therap. 2021. PMID: 33596925 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Studies Evaluating Spinal Manipulative Therapy and Infectious Disease and Immune System Outcomes: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215493. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5493. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33847753 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal Manipulative Therapy Effects in Autonomic Regulation and Exercise Performance in Recreational Healthy Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 1;44(9):609-614. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002908. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 30325889 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of spinal manipulative therapy on lower limb neurodynamic test outcomes in adults: a systematic review.J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Feb;28(1):4-14. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1569300. Epub 2019 Feb 5. J Man Manip Ther. 2020. PMID: 30935328 Free PMC article.
-
The risk of bias and sample size of trials of spinal manipulative therapy for low back and neck pain: analysis and recommendations.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Oct;37(8):523-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Sep 5. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014. PMID: 25194968
Cited by
-
I expected to be pain free: a qualitative study exploring athletes' expectations and experiences of care received by sports chiropractors.Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 2;30(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00426-4. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022. PMID: 35501876 Free PMC article.
-
A clinical crossover trial of the effect of manipulative therapy on pain and passive and active range of motion of the painful hip.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021 Dec;65(3):318-329. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021. PMID: 35197646 Free PMC article.
-
The mechanisms of manual therapy: A living review of systematic, narrative, and scoping reviews.PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319586. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40100908 Free PMC article.
-
The usage of multidisciplinary physical therapies at the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic Summer Games: an observational study.Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 32576442 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the research capacity and productivity of Canadian sports chiropractors.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2023 Dec;67(3):202-225. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2023. PMID: 38283160 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources