Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 5:4:11.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x. eCollection 2019.

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP

Cate Foster  1 , Elizabeth Wager  2   3 , Jackie Marchington  4 , Mina Patel  5 , Steve Banner  6 , Nina C Kennard  7 , Antonia Panayi  8 , Rianne Stacey  9 ; GPCAP Working Group
Affiliations

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP

Cate Foster et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. .

Abstract

Research that has been sponsored by pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology companies is often presented at scientific and medical conferences. However, practices vary between organizations and it can be difficult to follow both individual conference requirements and good publication practice guidelines. Until now, no specific guidelines or recommendations have been available to describe best practice for conference presentations. This document was developed by a working group of publication professionals and uploaded to PeerJ Preprints for consultation prior to publication; an additional 67 medical societies, medical conference sites and conference companies were also asked to comment. The resulting recommendations aim to complement current good publication practice and authorship guidelines, outline the general principles of best practice for conference presentations and provide recommendations around authorship, contributorship, financial transparency, prior publication and copyright, to conference organizers, authors and industry professionals. While the authors of this document recognize that individual conference guidelines should be respected, they urge organizers to consider authorship criteria and data transparency when designing submission sites and setting parameters around word/character count and content for abstracts. It is also important to recognize that conference presentations have different limitations to full journal publications, for example, in the case of limited audiences that necessitate refocused abstracts, or where lead authors do not speak the local language, and these have been acknowledged accordingly. The authors also recognize the need for further clarity regarding copyright of previously published abstracts and have made recommendations to assist with best practice. By following Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP recommendations, industry professionals, authors and conference organizers will improve consistency, transparency and integrity of publications submitted to conferences worldwide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests. Commercial affiliations are noted in the ‘Authors’ information’ section.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Roadmap of recommendations following abstract and presentation development stages
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
When is a presenter not an author? Different roles possible for authors and presenters of conference presentations
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Scherer RW, Meerpohl JJ, Pfeifer N, Schmucker C, Schwarzer G, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:MR000005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ICMJE Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Available at www.icmje.org. Accessed 14 May 2019. - PubMed
    1. Wager Elizabeth, Field Elizabeth A., Grossman Leni. Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2003;19(3):149–154. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001767. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D, Bruce-Winkler V, Conaty JM, Ellison JM, Field EA, Gurr JA, Marx ME, Patel M, Sanes-Miller C, Yarker YE. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ. 2009;339:b4330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4330. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battisti WP, Wager E, Baltzer L, Bridges D, Cairns A, Carswell CI, Citrome L, Gurr JA, Mooney LA, Moore BJ, Peña T, Sanes-Miller CH, Veitch K, Woolley KL, Yarker YE. Good publication practice for communicating company-sponsored medical research: GPP3. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:461–464. doi: 10.7326/M15-0288. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources