Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Mar 14;3(3):288-298.
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50142. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Protocol for a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing oncological outcomes of D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection in colonic cancer (COLD trial)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Protocol for a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing oncological outcomes of D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection in colonic cancer (COLD trial)

A Karachun et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: The extent of lymph node dissection in colonic cancer surgery remains arguable, and evidence from RCTs regarding extended lymph node dissection outcomes is lacking. This study aimed to compare the long-term results of D3 lymph node dissection with those of D2 dissection.

Methods: This is a multicentre RCT. The aim is to enrol 768 patients with primary colonic cancer assigned randomly to D2 or D3 lymph node dissection. The trial is assessing the superiority of 5-year overall survival as the primary endpoint in patients undergoing D3 lymph node dissection versus D2 dissection. Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, short-term outcomes (30-day morbidity and mortality), quality of complete mesocolic excision and lymph node dissection, pattern of lymph node metastasis and quality of life in patients following D2 and D3 lymph node dissection. Experience of 20 D3 and 20 D2 lymph node dissections is required for surgeons to participate in the trial. For surgical accreditation four non-edited videos of procedures will be assessed. Patients will be followed up for 5 years after last patient enrolment. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.

Discussion: The results of this study will demonstrate whether extended lymph node dissection is superior to standard dissection in terms of oncological outcomes, and will also assess the impact of more extensive surgery on short-term outcomes and quality of life.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03009227.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part II. Histopathological classification . Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Jpn J Surg 1983; 13: 574–598. - PubMed
    1. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y et al.; Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum . Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2015; 20: 207–239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S. Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 705–711. - PubMed
    1. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedemark B. Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm . Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 2000; 356: 93–96. - PubMed
    1. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 : 354–364. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data