Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;34(11):2355-2367.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05025-3. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

Variation in Physicians' Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation

Genna R Cohen  1 , Charles P Friedman  2 , Andrew M Ryan  3 , Caroline R Richardson  4 , Julia Adler-Milstein  5
Affiliations

Variation in Physicians' Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation

Genna R Cohen et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Physician-to-physician variation in electronic health record (EHR) documentation not driven by patients' clinical status could be harmful.

Objective: Measure variation in completion of common clinical documentation domains. Identify perceived causes and effects of variation and strategies to mitigate negative effects.

Design: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods using log data from a commercial EHR vendor and semi-structured interviews with outpatient primary care practices.

Participants: Quantitative: 170,332 encounters led by 809 physicians in 237 practices. Qualitative: 40 interviewees in 10 practices.

Main measures: Interquartile range (IQR) of the proportion of encounters in which a physician completed documentation, for each documentation category. Multilevel linear regression measured the proportion of variation at the physician level.

Key results: Five clinical documentation categories had substantial and statistically significant (p < 0.001) variation at the physician level after accounting for state, organization, and practice levels: (1) discussing results (IQR = 50.8%, proportion of variation explained by physician level = 78.1%); (2) assessment and diagnosis (IQR = 60.4%, physician-level variation = 76.0%); (3) problem list (IQR = 73.1%, physician-level variation = 70.1%); (4) review of systems (IQR = 62.3%, physician-level variation = 67.7%); and (5) social history (IQR = 53.3%, physician-level variation = 62.2%). Drivers of variation from interviews included user preferences and EHR designs with multiple places to record similar information. Variation was perceived to create documentation inefficiencies and risk patient harm due to missed or misinterpreted information. Mitigation strategies included targeted user training during EHR implementation and practice meetings focused on documentation standardization.

Conclusions: Physician-to-physician variation in EHR documentation impedes effective and safe use of EHRs, but there are potential strategies to mitigate negative consequences.

Keywords: EHR; documentation; mixed methods; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differentiating high- from low-variation categories. Note: High-variation categories are colored orange.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The meaningful use regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM. Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to ten other countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(12):2205–2215. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0879. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartman M, Martin AB, Benson J, Catlin A. National Health Expenditure Accounts Team. National health spending in 2011: overall growth remains low, but some payers and services show signs of acceleration. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(1):87–99. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1206. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yadav S, Kazanji N, K C N et al. Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(1):140–144. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald CJ, Callaghan FM, Weissman A, Goodwin RM, Mundkur M, Kuhn T. Use of internist’s free time by ambulatory care electronic medical record systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(11):1860–1863. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4506. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types