Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;111(2):297-321.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12409. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

Scary and nasty beasts: Self-reported fear and disgust of common phobic animals

Jakub Polák  1   2 , Silvie Rádlová  1 , Markéta Janovcová  1   3 , Jaroslav Flegr  1 , Eva Landová  1   3 , Daniel Frynta  1   3
Affiliations

Scary and nasty beasts: Self-reported fear and disgust of common phobic animals

Jakub Polák et al. Br J Psychol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Animal phobias are one of the most prevalent mental disorders. We analysed how fear and disgust, two emotions involved in their onset and maintenance, are elicited by common phobic animals. In an online survey, the subjects rated 25 animal images according to elicited fear and disgust. Additionally, they completed four psychometrics, the Fear Survey Schedule II (FSS), Disgust Scale - Revised (DS-R), Snake Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Spider Questionnaire (SPQ). Based on a redundancy analysis, fear and disgust image ratings could be described by two axes, one reflecting a general negative perception of animals associated with higher FSS and DS-R scores and the second one describing a specific aversion to snakes and spiders associated with higher SNAQ and SPQ scores. The animals can be separated into five distinct clusters: (1) non-slimy invertebrates; (2) snakes; (3) mice, rats, and bats; (4) human endo- and exoparasites (intestinal helminths and louse); and (5) farm/pet animals. However, only snakes, spiders, and parasites evoke intense fear and disgust in the non-clinical population. In conclusion, rating animal images according to fear and disgust can be an alternative and reliable method to standard scales. Moreover, tendencies to overgeneralize irrational fears onto other harmless species from the same category can be used for quick animal phobia detection.

Keywords: animal phobia; disease-avoidance model; factor analysis; preparedness theory; snakes; spiders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agras, S., Sylvester, D., & Oliveau, D. (1969). The epidemiology of common fears and phobia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 10, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(69)90022-4
    1. Arntz, A., Lavy, E., van den Berg, G., & van Rijsoort, S. (1993). Negative beliefs of spider phobics: A psychometric evaluation of the spider phobia beliefs questionnaire. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q
    1. Arrindell, W. A. (2000). Phobic dimensions: IV. The structure of animal fears. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00097-2
    1. Arrindell, W. A., Mulkens, S., Kok, J., & Vollenbroek, J. (1999). Disgust sensitivity and the sex difference in fears to common indigenous animals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00129-6
    1. Barrett, H. C. (2005). Adaptations to predators and prey. In D. M. Buss(Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 200 - 223). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch7

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources