Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
- PMID: 31186902
- PMCID: PMC6453055
- DOI: 10.1177/2055668316642387
Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
Abstract
Purpose: Due to limited accuracy of self-reported activities of lower limb prosthetic users, there is increasing interest in providing accurate walking time for those who are mobilising using their prosthesis in the rehabilitation ward. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of a tri axial accelerometer (ActivPAL) in measuring walking activity of amputee patients while using their prosthetic limb.
Method: For the study, 21 subjects wore accelerometer devices taped to the thigh on both the amputated and non-amputated side. Each subject was asked to perform a set of activity routines: walking with prosthesis for 5 minutes, self-propelling in a wheel chair for 3 minutes and being pushed in a wheel chair for 3 minutes. Each activity was observed and timed by a physiotherapist and the observed times were compared with the output from accelerometer monitoring.
Results: Using the Bland-Altman method, the mean difference between observed and ActivPal monitor for total time spent walking for the non-amputated side was 0.004 seconds (limits of agreement -0.09 to 0.10 seconds) and for amputated side was 0.11 seconds (limits of agreement -0.43 to 0.66 seconds). An analysis between monitored and observed time found the sensitivity for the non-amputated side was 90.5% and 86% for the amputated side.
Conclusion: The use of ActivPAL accelerometers in measuring walking time for an individual using a prosthesis is within acceptable levels of accuracy for continuous ambulation monitoring. It has potentially important clinical application for prescribing prostheses.
Keywords: Age-related rehabilitation; amputees; disability; gait rehabilitation; limb prosthetics; rehabilitation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Fletcher DD, Andrews KL, Butters MA, et al. Rehabilitation of the geriatric vascular amputee patient: A population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 776–779. - PubMed
-
- Fleury AM, Salih SA, Peel NM. Rehabilitation of the older vascular amputee: A review of the literature. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013; 13: 264–273. - PubMed
-
- Dillon MP, Kohler F, Peeva V. Incidence of lower limb amputation in Australian hospitals from 2000 to 2010. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014; 38: 122–132. - PubMed
-
- Rietman JS, Postema K, Geertzen JHB. Gait analysis in prosthetics: Opinions, ideas and conclusions. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 50–57. - PubMed
-
- Coleman KL, Boone DA, Laing LS, et al. Quantification of prosthetic outcomes: Elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 591–602. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
