Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 10:3:2055668316668146.
doi: 10.1177/2055668316668146. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.

Cognitive impairment and assistive devices: Outcomes and adverse effects

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive impairment and assistive devices: Outcomes and adverse effects

Jamal Alkadri et al. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. .

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this review was to investigate the relationship between cognitive impairment and assistive device use in elderly persons.

Methods: English-language articles for people aged 65 and over were identified by searching MEDLINE and Embase (1985-June 2015) with the keywords "self-help devices" and "cognition disorders" and relevant synonyms. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also examined; 510 articles were selected for further evaluation. Abstracts of the remaining articles were evaluated and all of the studies that concerned one or more of the following criteria were included: geriatric, long-term care residents or cognitively impaired patients using assistive devices that addressed benefits, risks, adverse effects, or other problems. Ultimately, 15 articles were analyzed and included in the review.

Results: Very few good-quality studies that specifically addressed the research question were found. We found that cognitively impaired elderly patients were more likely to use assistive devices ineffectively than cognitively intact elders. In addition, the literature describes promising approaches to assistive device training and technologies to accommodate cognitive impairment in this population.

Conclusion: The evidence basis for recommendations and training for assistive devices for cognitively impaired elders is weak. More research is needed on safety and effectiveness of devices for this population.

Keywords: Assistive device; cognitive disorders; cognitive impairment; geriatrics; safety; self-help devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the methods used in searching the literature and extracting relevant data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Dementia, http://www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/fs362/en/index.html (accessed 12 February 2016).
    1. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Dementia numbers in Canada, http://www.alzheimer.ca/en/About-dementia/what-is-dementia/Dementia-numbers (accessed 12 February 2016).
    1. Jutai J, Coulson S, Teasell R, et al. Mobility assistive device utilization in a prospective study of patients with first-ever stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1268–1275. - PubMed
    1. Cook A and Polgar J. Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. 4th ed. Mosby: St. Louis, MO, 2015, p. 496.
    1. Mann WC, Karuza J, Hurren D, et al. Assistive devices for home-based elderly persons with cognitive impairments. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1992; 8: 35–52.

LinkOut - more resources