Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 29;3(2):igz011.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz011. eCollection 2019 May.

Screening Older Adults for Depression: Barriers Across Clinical Discipline Training

Affiliations

Screening Older Adults for Depression: Barriers Across Clinical Discipline Training

Ronald Smith et al. Innov Aging. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Depressed older adults are more likely to be seen in primary care than in specialty mental health settings, but research shows that physicians may not routinely screen for depression. Other clinical disciplines are also in a position to screen for depression, but have not been studied. This study examined barriers to screening older adults for depression, and disciplinary differences in clinical trainees' likelihood of screening.

Research design and methods: We used a cross-sectional, online survey with experimental manipulation of vignettes. A four-way mixed analysis of variance explored the effects of clinical discipline (between subjects) and time pressure, patient difficulty, and level of symptoms (within subjects) on trainees' likelihood of screening.

Results: Participants were 229 trainees in medicine (83), psychology (51), nursing (49), and social work (46). Lower time pressure and greater symptom severity increased likelihood of screening. There was a significant three-way interaction among discipline, patient difficulty, and symptom level that was driven by social work graduate trainees' greater likelihood of screening for depression when there were more symptoms present, which was diminished if the patient was being difficult. There was a two-way interaction between patient difficulty and level of symptoms: more symptoms resulted in increased likelihood of screening, an effect that diminished with greater patient difficulty.

Discussion and implications: The study holds implications for identifying and addressing gaps in education on depression screening to minimize the effects of barriers. Interventions could address education about older adults and depression, including practice-based screening, time management, and behavior management skills.

Keywords: Barriers; Decision making; Depression; Primary care; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Plot of the marginal means for the likelihood of screening at the patient difficulty × symptom level interaction. Clockwise from top left: medicine, psychology, social work, and nursing.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A plot of the marginal means for likelihood of screening for depression at the patient difficulty × symptom level interaction for all participants across the four disciplines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akincigil A., & Matthews E. B. (2017). National rates and patterns of depression screening in primary care: Results from 2012 and 2013. Psychiatric services, 68, 660–666. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201600096 - PubMed
    1. Allan C. E., Valkanova V., & Ebmeier K. P (2014). Depression in older people is underdiagnosed. The Practitioner, 258, 19–22. - PubMed
    1. Callahan C. M., Nienaber N. A., Hendrie H. C., & Tierney W. M (1992). Depression of elderly outpatients: Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practice patterns. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 7, 26–31. doi:10.1007/bf02599097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conner K. O., Copeland V. C., Grote N. K., Koeske G., Rosen D., Reynolds C. F. 3rd, & Brown C (2010). Mental health treatment seeking among older adults with depression: The impact of stigma and race. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 531–543. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cc0366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans S. C.,, Roberts M. C.,, Keeley J. W.,, Blossom J. B.,, Amaro C. M.,, Garcia A. M.,…, Reed G. M. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15, 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed