Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8554.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44237-9.

Framing effect, probability distortion, and gambling tendency without feedback are resistant to two nights of experimental sleep restriction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Framing effect, probability distortion, and gambling tendency without feedback are resistant to two nights of experimental sleep restriction

Tina Sundelin et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Several studies suggest that sleep deprivation affects risky decision making. However, most of these are confounded by feedback given after each decision, indicating that decisions may be based on suboptimal feedback-learning rather than risk evaluation. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the effect of sleep loss on aspects of prospect theory, specifically the framing effect and probability distortion. In this within-subjects design, 25 people had (i) two nights of an 8 h sleep opportunity, and (ii) two nights of a 4 h sleep opportunity, in a counter-balanced order. Following the two nights, they performed a gambling task with no immediate feedback; for each round, they could either gamble for a full amount, or take a settlement framed as a gain or a loss for part of the amount. Sleep restriction did not significantly affect the tendency to gamble, the framing effect, or probability distortion, as compared to normal sleep. These results indicate that two nights of sleep restriction affects neither general gambling tendency, nor two of the main predictions of prospect theory. This resilience may be due to a less extreme sleep loss than in previous studies, but also indicates that learning components and risk biases should be separated when assessing the effect of sleep loss on risky behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gambling protocol for (a) loss frame and (b) gain frame.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages of trials gambled in the loss frame & gain frame after normal sleep and after sleep restriction to two nights with 4 hours’ time in bed per night. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The probability distortion in both sleep conditions for loss and gain frames. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Dashed line represents risk-neutral behaviour.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage (%) of trials in which subjects chose the gamble option in the gain and loss frames, for the four different starting amounts for both conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Dashed line represents risk-neutral behaviour.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yoo S-S, Gujar N, Hu P, Jolesz FA, Walker MP. The human emotional brain without sleep — a prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Current Biology. 2007;17:R877–R878. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nilsson JP, et al. Less effective executive functioning after one night’s sleep deprivation. J. Sleep Res. 2005;14:1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2005.00442.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker MP. The role of sleep in cognition and emotion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009;1156:168–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04416.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim J, Dinges DF. A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. Psychol. Bull. 2010;136:375–389. doi: 10.1037/a0018883. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drummond SP, Paulus MP, Tapert SF. Effects of two nights sleep deprivation and two nights recovery sleep on response inhibition. J. Sleep Res. 2006;15:261–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00535.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types