Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Nov;33(11):1762-1767.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0489-9. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Performance of the Barrett Toric Calculator with and without measurements of posterior corneal curvature

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of the Barrett Toric Calculator with and without measurements of posterior corneal curvature

Janusz Skrzypecki et al. Eye (Lond). 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Toric intraocular lens power calculators, e.g., the Barrett Toric Calculator, based on predicted, rather than on measured posterior corneal curvature have yielded the best results so far. However, recent update of the Barrett Toric Calculator aims to fine tune its refractive predictions with the input of measured posterior corneal curvature. Here, we wanted to compare refractive predictions of the Barrett Toric Calculator, based on IOL Master 700 biometry, with and without measurements of posterior corneal curvature.

Methods: In total 30 eyes were included in the study. One-month postoperative manifest refraction and predicted residual refractive error of both formulas were utilized to calculate mean absolute error and centroid error in predicted residual astigmatism. The Pentacam was used to measure posterior corneal curvature.

Results: We did not find any statistically significant difference in mean absolute error and centroid error in predicted residual astigmatism between the Barrett Toric Calculator with and without measurement of posterior corneal curvature. Post-hoc analysis of with-the-rule and against-the-rule astigmatic eyes did not reveal any significant differences as well.

Conclusions: Astigmatism prediction errors, based on IOL Master 700 biometry, with and without measured posterior corneal curvature, were similar. To the best of our knowledge, the updated Barrett Toric Calculator is the first formula to provide non-inferior and reliable predictions based on measurement of posterior corneal curvature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Double-angle diagrams illustrating centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism for the Barrett Toric calculator with a predicted posterior corneal astigmatism and b measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Double-angle diagrams illustrating centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism in eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism for the Barrett Toric calculator with a predicted posterior corneal astigmatism and b measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Double-angle diagrams illustrating centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism in eyes with with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism for the Barrett Toric calculator with a predicted posterior corneal astigmatism and b measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA)

References

    1. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:472–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1157–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts TV, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M, contributors to the Vision Eye Institute IOLor. Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:240–6. - PubMed
    1. Koch DD, Hill W, Abulafia A, Wang L. Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: I. Logical approach for classifying IOL calculation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:717–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Visser N, Beckers HJ, Bauer NJ, Gast ST, Zijlmans BL, Berenschot TT, et al. Toric vs aspherical control intraocular lenses in patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:1462–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3602. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types