Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 16:13:805-817.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S202748. eCollection 2019.

Patients' understanding of health information in Germany

Affiliations

Patients' understanding of health information in Germany

Florian Tille et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Background: Patient-physician communication and textual health information are central to health care. Yet, how well patients understand their physicians and written materials is under-studied. Objectives: Focusing on outpatient health care in Germany, the aim of this research was to assess patients' levels of understanding oral and written health information and to identify associations with socioeconomic variables. Methods: This analysis drew on a 2017 health survey (n=6,105 adults 18 years of age and above). Measures for the quality of patient-physician communication were derived from the Ask Me 3 program questions for consultations with general practitioners (GPs) and specialists (SPs), and for textual health information via a question on the comprehensibility of written materials. Correlations with socioeconomic variables were explored using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Over 90% of all respondents reported that they had understood the GP's and SP's explanations. A lack of understanding was most notably correlated with patients' self-reported very poor health (odds ratio [OR]: 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23-12.10), current health problem (OR: 6.54, CI: 1.70-25.12) and older age (65 years and above, OR: 2.97, CI: 1.10-8.00). Fewer patients reported that they understood written materials well (86.7% for last visit at GP, 89.7% for last visit at SP). Difficulties in understanding written materials were strongly correlated with basic education (OR: 4.20, CI: 2.76-6.39) and older age (65 years and above, OR: 2.66, CI: 1.43-4.96). Conclusions: In order to increase patients' understanding of health information and reduce inequalities among patient subgroups, meeting the communication needs of patients of older age, low educational status and with poor health is essential.

Keywords: Ask Me 3; health literacy; health survey; patient–physician communication; socioeconomic variables; written health information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Heide Weishaar reports being a research fellow on a project aimed at developing a national action plan for health literacy in Germany whilst writing the manuscript. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Rudd RE. Health Literacy: insights and Issues. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017a;240:60–78. - PubMed
    1. Pelikan JM, Dietscher C. Warum sollten und wie können Krankenhäuser ihre organisationale Gesundheitskompetenz verbessern? Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2015;58:989–995. doi:10.1007/s00103-015-2206-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rudd RE. Health literacy developments, corrections, and emerging themes In: Schaeffer D, Pelikan JM, editors. Health Literacy, Forschungsstand und Perspektiven. 1st ed. Bern: Hogrefe; 2017b:19–32.
    1. Schaeffer D, Pelikan JM. Health Literacy: begriff, Konzept, Relevanz In: Schaeffer D, Pelikan JM, editors. Health Literacy, Forschungsstand und Perspektiven. 1st ed. Bern: Hogrefe; 2017a:11–18.
    1. Lee SY, Arozullah AM, Cho YI. Health literacy, social support, and health: a research agenda. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1309–1321. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources