Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 17:10:153-156.
doi: 10.2147/PROM.S198619. eCollection 2019.

Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ)

Affiliations

Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ)

David Morley et al. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. .

Abstract

Background: The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) is a recently validated 23-item generic patient reported outcome measure that is theoretically grounded in the World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), as well as fully FDA compliant. The measure comprises three domains, Routine Activities (14 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items) and Social Engagement (4 items), and has been shown to be both valid and reliable. The aim of this study was to make a preliminary assessment of the sensitivity to the change of the Ox-PAQ. Methods: Three hundred and seventy three people with either chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease completed the Ox-PAQ electronically on two occasions, six months apart. Participants completed an additional four questions during the second administration of the Ox-PAQ in order to assess any relevant changes since baseline. For each of the three Ox-PAQ domains, the minimally important difference (MID) and effect size (ES) was calculated from those participants indicating small, but meaningful positive improvement. Results: Two hundred and ninety respondents were entered into the final analysis, 77.74% of the original sample. For those indicating "slight improvement" in Routine Activities (n=19), an MID of 7.51 and an ES of 0.32 was calculated. For Emotional Well-Being (n=26), the MID was 10.77 and the ES 0.44. For Social Engagement (n=16), the MID was 5.47 and the ES 0.28. Conclusion: Data presented provides MID improvement and effect sizes for Ox-PAQ domains that will act as preliminary guidance for those powering clinical trials assessing activity and participation. Future research with larger samples will provide further sensitivity to change data for the Ox-PAQ.

Keywords: activity; effect size; minimally important difference; participation; sensitivity to change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research was presented at ISPOR Europe 2018 held in Barcelona, Spain, 10–14 November, 2018, as a poster with interim findings. The abstract was published in Value in Health, Volume 21, Supplement 3, S327. All authors are developers of the Ox-PAQ and will receive royalties from its use in commercial contexts. All authors have also undertaken consultancy work for Oxford University Innovation Ltd which holds the license for the Ox-PAQ. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
    1. Kelly L, Jenkinson C, Dummett S, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Morley D. Development of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire: constructing an item pool. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:145–155. doi:10.2147/PROM.S82121 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Food & Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Sciences. Guidance to Industry. Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labelling Claims. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2009.
    1. Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C. Validation of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;7:73–80. doi:10.2147/PROM.S102732 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roach KE. Measurement of health outcomes: reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006;18:P8–P12. doi:10.1097/00008526-200601001-00003 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources