Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jun 1;18(2):376-383.
eCollection 2019 Jun.

Safety Evaluation of Protective Equipment for the Forearm, Shin, Hand and Foot in Taekwondo

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Safety Evaluation of Protective Equipment for the Forearm, Shin, Hand and Foot in Taekwondo

Hee Seong Jeong et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare different brands of forearm, shin, hand and foot protective equipment used in Taekwondo. The most popular brands of large forearm, shin, hand and foot protectors (D®, A®, K ®), approved by the World Taekwondo and Korean Taekwondo Association, were examined. A drop test was used to test the protective equipment using impact levels of 3J, 9J, 12J and 15J for the forearm and shin guards, and 3J and 9J for the hand and foot protectors. The protective equipment was hit ten times from each of the designated drop heights. The drop test is described in the European standards manual of protective equipment for martial arts (SRPS EN 13277-2). The maximum force (MF) and impulse were lowest for brand K® (2610.3 ± 1474.1 N), and brand A® (9.6 ± 3.1 Ns), respectively, for the forearm guards; for brand A® (2053.4 ± 1267.1 N) and brand K® (9.8 ± 3.5 Ns), respectively, for the shin guards; for brand K® (4486.5 ± 1718.4 N), and brand A® (6.3 ± 1.1 Ns), respectively for the hand protectors; and for brand A® (3733.7 ± 2465.3 N), and brand D® (6.8 ± 0.6 Ns), respectively, for the foot protectors. For the forearm guard brand and impact level, there was a significant interaction effect for the MF (F=42.44, η2=.677, p <0.001) and impulse (F = 33.97, η2 = 0.626, p <0.001). Based on the MF, brand K® performed the best for the forearm guards and hand protectors, and brand A®, for the shin guards and foot protectors. The best results for the impulse were for brand A® (forearm guards and hand protectors), brand K® (shin guards) and brand D® (foot protectors).

Keywords: Injury prevention; PSS; Taekwondo rules; protectors; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Impact testing equipment for the modified SRPS EN 13277-2. The schematic of the equipment design (A), the picture of the equipment (B), the close-up picture of the striker (C).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interaction effects between the protector brands and the impact levels. Maximum force for the forearm guards (A), impulse for the forearm guards (B), maximum force for the shin guards (C), impulse for the shin guards (D), maximum force for the hand protectors (E), impulse for the hand protectors (F), maximum force for the foot protectors (G), impulse for the foot protectors (H).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arthur L.E. (1982) Karate protective equipment. In: Google Patents.
    1. Bae Y.S. (2013) Relationship between the impact value of electronic body protector and the impact force of force platform in the Taekwondo. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics 23(2), 125-130.
    1. Beumer A., Van Hemert W.L.W., Swierstra B.A., Jasper L.E., Belkoff S.M. (2003) A biomechanical evaluation of the tibiofibular and tibiotalar ligaments of the ankle. Foot and Ankle International 24(5), 426-429. - PubMed
    1. Bir C.A., Cassatta S.J., Janda D.H. (1995) An analysis and comparison of soccer shin guards. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 5(2), 95-99. - PubMed
    1. Bromley S.J., Drew M.K., Talpey S., McIntosh A.S., Finch C.F. (2018) A systematic review of prospective epidemiological research into injury and illness in Olympic combat sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine 52(1), 8-16. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources