Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May-Jun;21(3):101-112.
doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-006.

Multiple Sclerosis at Home Access (MAHA): An Initiative to Improve Care in the Community

Multiple Sclerosis at Home Access (MAHA): An Initiative to Improve Care in the Community

Kathleen Healey et al. Int J MS Care. 2019 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Caring for individuals with progressive, disabling forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) presents ongoing, complex challenges in health care delivery, especially access to care. Although mobility limitations represent a major hurdle to accessing comprehensive and coordinated care, fragmentation in current models of health care delivery magnify the problem. Importantly, individuals with disabling forms of MS are exceedingly likely to develop preventable secondary complications and to incur significant suffering and increased health care utilization and costs.

Methods: A house call program, Multiple Sclerosis at Home Access (MAHA), was implemented. The program was designed to provide comprehensive services and prevent common complications. Key aspects included monthly house calls, continuity among providers, and a multidisciplinary team led by a comprehensivist, a provider bridging subspecialty and primary care. A total of 21 adult patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≥7.5) completed 1 full year of the program.

Results: During the 2-year preevaluation and postevaluation period, half of the hospital admissions were related to secondary and generally preventable complications. Aside from a single outlying individual important to the evaluation, in the year after program implementation, decreases were found in number of individuals hospitalized, hospitalizations/skilled facility admissions, and hospital days; the total number of overall emergency department (ED) visits decreased; and ED-only visits increased (ie, ED visits without hospital admission). Patient satisfaction reports and quality indicators were positive. Fifty percent of patients participated in supplementary televisits.

Conclusions: This program evaluation suggests that a house call-based practice is a viable solution for improving care delivery for patients with advanced MS and disability.

Keywords: Comprehensive care; Disability; House call; Multidisciplinary team; Multiple sclerosis (MS); Progressive multiple sclerosis; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Healey has received grants from the Multiple Sclerosis Foundation. Dr. Zabad has been a site investigator or principal investigator for clinical trials funded by Biogen, Genentech, Novartis, and Sun Pharma; in the past 2 years, has served as a consultant for Bayer, Genzyme, Teva Neuroscience, and TG Therapeutics and has given unbranded lectures sponsored by Teva; and is also a member of the adjudication committee for a clinical trial of biotin in primary and secondary progressive MS sponsored by PAREXEL and MedDay Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual framework ED, emergency department; MAHA, Multiple Sclerosis at Home Access; MS, multiple sclerosis; UTI, urinary tract infection. A variation of this figure was previously published in F1000Research, an open-access journal that permits redistribution of original work.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Multiple Sclerosis at Home Access (MAHA) model CTL, care team leader; MS, multiple sclerosis; OT, occupational therapy; PCP, primary care provider; PT, physical therapy. This figure was previously published in F1000Research, an open-access journal that permits redistribution of original work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Minden SL, Frankel D, Hadden L, Perloffp J, Srinath KP, Hoaglin DC. The Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study: methods and sample characteristics. Mult Scler. 2006;12:24–38. - PubMed
    1. Wallin MT. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a population-based healthcare database approach. ECTRIMS Online Library. Oct 26, 2017. Abstract P344.
    1. Foley PL, Vesterinen HM, Laird BJ et al. Prevalence and natural history of pain in adults with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2013;154:632–642. - PubMed
    1. Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A. The impact of increasing neurological disability of multiple sclerosis on health utilities: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Econ. 2010;13:78–89. - PubMed
    1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society Strategic Response White Paper 2011–2015. New York, NY: National Multiple Sclerosis Society; 2016.