Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 28:10:1114.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01114. eCollection 2019.

Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students

Anne Deiglmayr  1   2 , Elsbeth Stern  1 , Renate Schubert  1
Affiliations

Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students

Anne Deiglmayr et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

A wide-spread stereotype that influences women's paths into STEM (or non-STEM) fields is the implicit association of science and mathematics with "male" and with requiring high levels of male-associated "brilliance." Recent research on such "field-specific ability beliefs" has shown that a high emphasis on brilliance in a specific field goes along with a low share of female students among its graduates. A possible mediating mechanisms between cultural expectations and stereotypes on the one hand, and women's underrepresentation in math-intensive STEM fields on the other hand, is that women may be more likely than men to feel that they do not belong in these fields. In the present study, we investigated field-specific ability beliefs as well as belonging uncertainty in a sample of n = 1294 male and female university students from five STEM fields (Mathematics, Physics, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering) at a prestigious technical university in Switzerland. Field-specific ability beliefs of both men and women emphasized brilliance more in more math-intensive fields (Mathematics, Physics) than in less math-intensive fields (Engineering). Women showed higher beliefs in brilliance than men did, and also reported higher levels of belonging uncertainty. For both genders, there was a small, positive correlation (r = 0.19) of belief in brilliance and belonging uncertainty. A relatively small, but significant portion of the effect of gender on belonging uncertainty was mediated by women's higher belief in brilliance.

Keywords: STEM gender gap; belonging uncertainty; field-specific ability beliefs; gender stereotypes; university students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Scatterplot of belief in brilliance and the percentage of female students in the five departments.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Berkowitz M., Stern E. (2018). Which cognitive abilities make the difference? Predicting academic achievements in advanced STEM studies. J. Intell. 6 1–24. 10.3390/jintelligence6040048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berkowitz M., Stern E., Hofer S., Deiglmayr A. (in press). “Girls, boys and schools: On gender (in)equalities in education,” in The Cambridge International Handbook on Psychology of Women, eds Cheung F. M., Halpern D. F. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ).
    1. Bian L., Leslie S. J., Murphy M., Cimpian A. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 76 404–420. 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006 - DOI
    1. Ceci S. J., Ginther D. K., Kahn S., Williams W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychol. Sci. Public Int. 15 75–141. 10.1177/1529100614541236 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheryan S., Ziegler S. A., Montoya A. K., Jiang L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychol. Bull. 143 1–35. 10.1037/bul0000052 - DOI - PubMed