Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 28:10:1116.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01116. eCollection 2019.

The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners

Affiliations
Review

The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Researchers and Practitioners

Peter J O'Connor et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Emotional Intelligence (EI) emerged in the 1990s as an ability based construct analogous to general Intelligence. However, over the past 3 decades two further, conceptually distinct forms of EI have emerged (often termed "trait EI" and "mixed model EI") along with a large number of psychometric tools designed to measure these forms. Currently more than 30 different widely-used measures of EI have been developed. Although there is some clarity within the EI field regarding the types of EI and their respective measures, those external to the field are faced with a seemingly complex EI literature, overlapping terminology, and multiple published measures. In this paper we seek to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners seeking to utilize EI in their work. We first provide an overview of the different conceptualizations of EI. We then provide a set of recommendations for practitioners and researchers regarding the most appropriate measures of EI for a range of different purposes. We provide guidance both on how to select and use different measures of EI. We conclude with a comprehensive review of the major measures of EI in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity.

Keywords: ability; emotional intelligence; measures; mixed; questionnaires; recommendations; trait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrei F., Siegling A. B., Aloe A. M., Baldaro B., Petrides K. V. (2016). The incremental validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Personal. Assess. 98, 261–276. 10.1080/00223891.2015.1084630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashkanasy N. M., Daus C. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. J. Organiz. Behav. 26, 441–452. 10.1002/job.320 - DOI
    1. Austin E. J. (2010). Measurement of ability emotional intelligence: Results for two new tests. Br. J. Psychol. 101, 563–578. 10.1348/000712609X474370 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin E. J., Saklofske D. H., Mastoras S. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence, coping and exam-related stress in Canadian undergraduate students. Austral. J. Psychol. 62, 42–50. 10.1080/00049530903312899 - DOI
    1. Bar-On R. (1996). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): A Test of Emotional Intelligence. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.