Intention to Read to Newborns Following a Brief Reading Promotion Intervention among Low-Income Pregnant Women
- PMID: 31191810
- PMCID: PMC6527200
Intention to Read to Newborns Following a Brief Reading Promotion Intervention among Low-Income Pregnant Women
Abstract
Introduction: Reading to children can increase word knowledge and success in school. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends beginning reading at birth. However, children from low-income families are exposed to less words, including reading exposure, than children from high-income families.
Methods: Pregnant women attending a community prenatal education program targeted at high-risk and low-income populations were recruited into this study. Participants completed a pre-survey, engaged with a brief educational intervention, then completed a matched post-survey. Surveys assessed perceived benefits, intended behaviors, and self-efficacy regarding reading to their child.
Results: Of 61 eligible participants, 54 (89%) completed the study. Participants reported being Black (33%), White (30%), Hispanic (28%), and other race (9%). Average gestational age at enrollment was 27 weeks (range 13 to 38 weeks). The average age of respondents was 26 years (SD = 7.2); 46% reported being pregnant for the first time. Following the intervention, no change in knowledge regarding benefits of reading was observed, however, baseline knowledge was high (58% - 94%). At post-test, significantly more women reported it was important to start reading to their child at birth (83% vs 56%; p < 0.001) and that they planned to start reading to their child at birth (70% vs 50%; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: A brief educational intervention showed promise in increasing pregnant women's intentions to read to their children and should be considered in conjunction with other reading promotion programs. Follow-up to assess actual reading behavior is needed.
Keywords: education; infant; pregnant women; reading.
Similar articles
-
Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference?Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 2):927-34. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 10742349 Clinical Trial.
-
Determinants of child-bearing intentions of low-income women: attitudes versus life circumstances.J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Apr;24(2):157-66. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000019696. J Biosoc Sci. 1992. PMID: 1583030
-
Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.Pediatrics. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):993-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.5.993. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 10224178 Clinical Trial.
-
Pregnant Women's Intentions to Deliver at a Health Facility in the Pastoralist Communities of Afar, Ethiopia: An Application of the Health Belief Model.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 11;16(5):888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050888. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30862098 Free PMC article.
-
Beginning reading interventions for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 5;12(12):CD011359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011359.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31805208 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kuo AA, Franke TM, Regalado M, Halfon N. Parent report of reading to young children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6 Suppl):1944–1951. - PubMed
-
- Freebody P, Ludwig C, Gunn S. Everyday literacy practices in and out of school. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Literacy Education Research; 1995.
-
- Debaryshe BD. Joint picture-book reading correlates of early oral language skill. J Child Lang. 1993;20(2):455–461. - PubMed
-
- Pagani LS, Fitzpatrick C. Children’s school readiness: Implications for eliminating future disparities in health and education. Health Educ Behav. 2014;41(1):25–33. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources