Association between Allogeneic Blood Transfusion and Wound Infection after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
- PMID: 31192107
- PMCID: PMC6536767
- DOI: 10.7150/jbji.30636
Association between Allogeneic Blood Transfusion and Wound Infection after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Abstract
Background: To assess using a retrospective case control study, whether patients undergoing primary, elective total hip or knee arthroplasty who receive blood transfusion have a higher rate of post-operative infection compared to those who do not. Materials and Methods: Data on elective primary total hip or knee arthroplasty patients, including patient characteristics, co-morbidities, type and duration of surgery, blood transfusion, deep and superficial infection was extracted from the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare deep infection and superficial infection in blood-transfused and non-transfused cohorts. Results: Of the 27892 patients identified, 3098 (11.1%) received blood transfusion (TKA 9.7%; THA 13.1%). Overall, the rate of superficial infection (SI) was 0.5% and deep infection (DI) was 1.1%. The infection rates in the transfused cohort were SI 1.0% and DI 1.6%, and in the non-transfused cohort were SI 0.5% and DI 1.0%. The transfused cohort had an increased risk of superficial infection (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.9 [95% CI 1.2-2.9, p-value 0.005]) as well as deep infection (adjusted OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.2, p-value 0.008]). Conclusion: The odds of superficial and deep wound infection are significantly increased in primary, elective total hip and knee arthroplasty patients who receive blood transfusion compared to those who did not. This study can potentially help in reducing periprosthetic hip or knee infections.
Keywords: blood transfusion; infection; total hip replacement; total knee replacement.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
References
-
- Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Bozic KJ, Mont MA. The Economic Impact of Periprosthetic Infections After Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Specialized Tertiary-Care Center. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(7):1422–1426. doi:10.1016/ j.arth.2016.01.021. - PubMed
-
- Haddad FS, Ngu A, Negus JJ. Prosthetic Joint Infections and Cost Analysis? In: Springer, Cham; 2017. pp. 93–100. doi:10.1007/5584_2016_155. - PubMed
-
- Matsen Ko L, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection: novel developments. Orthop Clin N Am. 2016;47:1–9. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1371768. - PubMed
-
- Tissingh EK, Sudlow A, Jones A, Nolan JF. Orthopaedic surgical site infection surveillance in NHS England. Bone Joint J; 2017. p. 99. -B(2):171-174. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0420.R1. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
