Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers
- PMID: 31192233
- PMCID: PMC6546718
- DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00146
Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers
Abstract
There is mounting concern about the negative animal health and supply chain consequences of animal disease outbreaks in the United States. Recent disease outbreaks have drawn attention to the need for additional understanding of biosecurity efforts to reduce disease frequency, spread, and impact. Biosecurity is a key component of the Secure Pork Supply (SPS) Plan designed to provide business continuity in the event of a foreign animal disease outbreak as well as help protect operations from endemic diseases. Core biosecurity recommendations outlined in the SPS Plan are a written site-specific biosecurity plan and implementation of a perimeter buffer area and a line of separation. To-date, no benchmarking of SPS Plan biosecurity implementation has been done. Utilizing data from a 2017 survey of U.S. swine producers, this study shows that SPS Plan biosecurity adoption varies and is affected by how feasible producers believe implementation of each biosecurity practice is on their operation. Furthermore, binomial logit regression analyses indicate producer and operation demographics and producer risk attitudes and perceptions affect biosecurity adoption. Conditional probabilities reveal that adoption of biosecurity practices is overwhelmingly complementary, suggesting that one biosecurity practice likely increases marginal efficacy of another biosecurity practice. The insights this study provides regarding the complexities of biosecurity adoption are vitally important to both educators and policy makers.
Keywords: Secure Pork Supply Plan; animal health economics; biosecurity adoption; foreign animal diseases; pig; swine.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Description of swine producer biosecurity planning for foreign animal disease preparedness using the Secure Pork Supply framework.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 26;11:1380623. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1380623. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38737457 Free PMC article.
-
U.S. Cattle Producer Adoption of Secure Beef Supply Plan Enhanced Biosecurity Practices and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Preparedness.Front Vet Sci. 2021 Aug 6;8:660857. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.660857. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34422939 Free PMC article.
-
Biosecurity Insights from the United States Swine Health Improvement Plan: Analyzing Data to Enhance Industry Practices.Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;14(7):1134. doi: 10.3390/ani14071134. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38612372 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in swine farm biosecurity in North America.Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 3;12:1507704. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1507704. eCollection 2025. Front Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40098891 Free PMC article.
-
African Swine Fever: A Review of Current Disease Management Strategies and Risks Associated with Exhibition Swine in the United States.Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;13(23):3713. doi: 10.3390/ani13233713. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38067064 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laboratory testing and on-site storage are successful at mitigating the risk of release of foot-and-mouth disease virus via production of bull semen in the USA.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 7;18(11):e0294036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294036. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37934775 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing infection control practices and biosecurity plans on Swedish pig farms: insights, challenges, and strategies.Acta Vet Scand. 2024 Sep 11;66(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13028-024-00771-9. Acta Vet Scand. 2024. PMID: 39261945 Free PMC article.
-
African Swine Fever: Transmission, Spread, and Control through Biosecurity and Disinfection, Including Polish Trends.Viruses. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):2275. doi: 10.3390/v15112275. Viruses. 2023. PMID: 38005951 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 18;11(3):792. doi: 10.3390/ani11030792. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33803495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Description of swine producer biosecurity planning for foreign animal disease preparedness using the Secure Pork Supply framework.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 26;11:1380623. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1380623. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38737457 Free PMC article.
References
-
- United States Department of Agriculture: Foreign Agricultural Service Office of Global Analysis (USDA-FAS-OGA) Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. FAS; (2018). Available online at: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/downloads (accessed September 16, 2018).
-
- United States Department of Agriculture: Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) . Hogs: Annual and Cumulative Year-to-Date U.S. Trade - All Years and Countries. ERS; (2018). Available online at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/livestock-and-meat-international-... (accessed September 16, 2018).
-
- United States Department of Agriculture: National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS) . Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2017 Summary. NASS (2018). Available online at: https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/02870v85d/tb... (accessed April 5, 2019).
-
- Secure Pork Supply (2018). U.S. Pork Industry Guide to the Secure Pork Supply Plan. Available online at: http://www.securepork.org/Resources/SPS-Booklet-2018.pdf (accessed April 5, 2019).
-
- Levis DG, Baker RB. Biosecurity of pigs and farm security. In: The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. (2011). Available online at: http://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/ec289.pdf (accessed April 5, 2019).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources