Epidemiological Analysis of Changes in Clinical Practice for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears From 2010 to 2015
- PMID: 31192267
- PMCID: PMC6540509
- DOI: 10.1177/2325967119845912
Epidemiological Analysis of Changes in Clinical Practice for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears From 2010 to 2015
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff injuries are a leading cause of shoulder disability among adults. Surgical intervention is a common treatment modality; however, conservative management has been described for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. As the cost of health care increases, the industry has shifted to optimizing patient outcomes, reducing readmissions, and reducing expenditure. In 2010, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to guide the management of rotator cuff injuries. Since their publication, there have been several randomized controlled trials assessing the management of rotator cuff injuries.
Purpose: To quantitatively describe changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears over time with regard to the publication of the CPGs and prospective clinical trials.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Included in the study were Humana-insured patients in the PearlDiver database with the diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear from 2010 to 2015. Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (CPT-29827, CPT-23410, CPT-23412, CPT-23420) and patients undergoing nonoperative management in the queried years were identified. The incidence of physical therapy (PT), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroid injections was assessed.
Results: In 2015, patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to receive a corticosteroid injection (16.5% vs 23.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P < .001) or undergo PT (7.8% vs 12.1%, respectively; OR, 0.6; P < .001) before rotator cuff repair in comparison with 2010. Additionally, patients were no more likely to be prescribed NSAIDs before rotator cuff repair in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (OR, 1.0; P = .6). Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to undergo acromioplasty in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (48.2% vs 76.9%, respectively; OR, 0.4; P < .001); however, the rate of concomitant biceps tenodesis slightly increased (14.8% vs 14.6%, respectively; OR, 1.1; P = .01).
Conclusion: From 2010 to 2015, there were changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, including decreased preoperative utilization of corticosteroid injections and PT as well as a decrease in concomitant acromioplasty, and the rate of biceps tenodesis slightly increased. As CPGs and prospective investigations continue to proliferate, management practices of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears continue to evolve.
Keywords: acromioplasty; biceps tenodesis; clinical practice guidelines; rotator cuff repair; value-based care.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: G.L.C. has received research support from Arthrex and educational support from Medwest and Smith & Nephew. A.A.R. has received consulting fees and receives royalties from Arthrex. B.J.C. has received research support from Aesculap/B. Braun, Arthrex, Geistlich, Sanofi-Aventis, and Zimmer Biomet; consulting fees from Anika Therapeutics, Arthrex, Bioventus, Flexion, Geistlich, Genzyme, Pacira, Smith & Nephew, Vericel, and Zimmer Biomet; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex, LifeNet Health, and Pacira; educational support from Arthrex; hospitality payments from GE Healthcare; receives royalties from Arthrex, DJO, and Elsevier; and has stock options in Aqua Boom, Biometrix, Giteliscope, Ossio, and Regentis. N.N.V. has received research support from Arthrex, Arthrosurface, DJO, Ossur, Athletico, ConMed Linvatec, Miomed, and Mitek; consulting fees from Arthrex, Medacta, Minivasive, OrthoSpace, and Smith & Nephew; nonconsulting fees from Pacira; educational support from Medwest; receives royalties from Arthroscopy, Smith & Nephew, and Vindico Medical Education–Orthopedics Hyperguide; and has stock options in CyMedica, Minivasive, and Omeros. B.F. has received research support from Arthrex, Arthrosurface, DJO, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Stryker; educational support from Medwest, Smith & Nephew, and Ossur; consulting fees from Arthrex, Sonoma Orthopedics, and Stryker; speaking fees from Arthrex; receives royalties from Arthrex and Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier; and has stock options in Jace Medical. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Similar articles
-
Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With and Without Acromioplasty: Randomized Prospective Trial With 2-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1296-303. doi: 10.1177/0363546514529091. Epub 2014 Apr 14. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24733157 Clinical Trial.
-
Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging.Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):99-103. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307504. Epub 2007 Oct 11. Am J Sports Med. 2008. PMID: 17932406
-
Rotator cuff tears in overhead athletes.Clin Sports Med. 2012 Oct;31(4):675-92. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.005. Clin Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 23040553 Review.
-
A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1043-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314409. Epub 2008 Mar 19. Am J Sports Med. 2008. PMID: 18354140 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears.Clin Sports Med. 2012 Oct;31(4):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Clin Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 23040548 Review.
Cited by
-
A two-step neural network-based guiding system for obtaining reliable radiographs for critical shoulder angle measurement.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1406-1416. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-610. Epub 2024 Jan 5. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 38415118 Free PMC article.
-
Rotator Cuff Repair With Acromioplasty Is Associated With an Increased Rate of Revision and Subsequent Procedures.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Nov 1;4(6):e2065-e2071. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.008. eCollection 2022 Dec. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 36579038 Free PMC article.
-
Health Care Utilization and Costs in the Year Prior to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 24;8(7):2325967120937016. doi: 10.1177/2325967120937016. eCollection 2020 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32782903 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of All-Suture Anchors and Metal Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Anchor Pullout Risk.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2619. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082619. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40283449 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of the hourglass biceps test for the detection of intra-articular long head of the biceps hypertrophy.JSES Int. 2020 Jul 11;4(4):906-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020 Dec. JSES Int. 2020. PMID: 33345233 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abrams GD, Gupta AK, Hussey KE, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without acromioplasty: randomized prospective trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1296–1303. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems: guideline and evidence report. https://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/rcp_guideline.pdf. Published December 4, 2010.
-
- Arshi A, Kabir N, Cohen JR, et al. Utilization and costs of postoperative physical therapy after rotator cuff repair: a comparison of privately insured and Medicare patients. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(12):2392–2399. - PubMed
-
- Bailey JR, Kim C, Alentorn-Geli E, et al. Rotator cuff matrix augmentation and interposition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(6):1496–1506. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials