Further psychometric analysis of the 20-item Partner Interaction Questionnaire in an adult sample of smokers
- PMID: 31192622
- PMCID: PMC7123497
- DOI: 10.1037/adb0000477
Further psychometric analysis of the 20-item Partner Interaction Questionnaire in an adult sample of smokers
Abstract
The 20-item Partner Interaction Questionnaire (PIQ-20) is frequently used to assess social support for adults wanting to stop smoking. Given that social support may play a significant role in quitting success, there is a need to understand the structure and psychometric properties of assessment instruments designed to measure the construct of partner support. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the PIQ-20 when used to assess the frequency of partner behaviors. The study participants included 380 adult volunteers (M age = 41 years, SD = 12; 58% male). To assess internal consistency, we used both the traditional coefficient-alpha and the latent variable modeling composite reliability (coefficient-ρ) procedures. We conducted independent factor analytic methods to address issues of dimensionality and scoring of responses to the PIQ-20 items. Also, we used an item response theory modeling procedure to examine the specificity of scores on the items. Reliability estimates for the PIQ-20 subscale scores were adequate (values ≥.70). The bifactor analysis supported deriving a total score for each subscale. Item response theory modeling demonstrated that the discrimination (a-slope) parameter for each subscale item was significantly different from zero. The majority of items were associated strongly with their respective subscales. Twelve items were identified that could be adopted as a potential short form of the PIQ-20. The PIQ-20 or short form provides an opportunity for assessing positive and negative partner support simultaneously. There is empirical support for the dimensional structures and scoring of responses for both versions of the instrument. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Development and validation of the online social support for smokers scale.J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 28;13(3):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1801. J Med Internet Res. 2011. PMID: 21955465 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: A reevaluation of the psychometric properties across two independent samples of smokers.Psychol Assess. 2018 May;30(5):678-692. doi: 10.1037/pas0000511. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Psychol Assess. 2018. PMID: 28782978 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' perceptions of autonomy support during transition to value-based reimbursement: A multi-center psychometric evaluation of six-item and three-item measures.PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230907. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32236139 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
-
Psychometric analysis and critical appraisal of the original, revised, and modified versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in the assessment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1648. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. PMID: 27246489 Review.
Cited by
-
Couple-Focused Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Problem Drinking: Pilot Randomized Control Trial.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 1;8:e58622. doi: 10.2196/58622. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39486022 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of an interactive web-based health program for adults: a study protocol for three concurrent controlled-randomized trials (EVA-TK-Coach).Trials. 2021 Aug 10;22(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05470-8. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34376228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Asparouhov T, & Muthén B (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204 - DOI
-
- Baker FB, & Kim SH (Eds.). (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York; Marcel Dekker.
-
- Browne MW, & Cudeck R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In Bollen KA & Long JS (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
-
- Cohen S (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684. - PubMed