Reply by Authors
- PMID: 31192753
- DOI: 10.1097/01.JU.0000569236.63335.db
Reply by Authors
Comment on
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):531. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000569232.25218.7c. Epub 2019 Aug 8. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31192750 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):530-531. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000569228.40465.d4. Epub 2019 Aug 8. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31192751 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reply by Authors.J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1172-1173. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000581796.73447.de. Epub 2019 Aug 30. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31469607 No abstract available.
-
Reply by Authors.J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1635. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.085. Epub 2018 Mar 20. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29571694 No abstract available.
-
Reply from Authors re: Matthew T. Gettman. Assessing Work Disability After Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;70:72-3: The Challenge of Assessing Work Disability.Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):73-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26873837 No abstract available.
-
Should the seminal vesicles be resected during radical prostatectomy?Urology. 1998 Jan;51(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00475-5. Urology. 1998. PMID: 9457282 Review. No abstract available.
-
Prostatakarzinom: Wieviel Zeit darf bis zur Operation vergehen?Aktuelle Urol. 2020 Apr;51(2):97-98. doi: 10.1055/a-1017-7521. Epub 2020 Mar 24. Aktuelle Urol. 2020. PMID: 32208507 Review. German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical