General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
- PMID: 31192902
- PMCID: PMC6578874
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002225
General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
Abstract
Objective: To determine the extent to which bilateral cochlear implantation increases patient-reported benefit as compared with unilateral implantation and no implantation.
Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases searches were performed using the keywords ("Cochlear Implant" or "Cochlear Implantation") and ("bilateral").
Study selection: Studies assessing hearing/CI-specific (CI) and general-health-related (HR) quality of life (QOL) in adult patients after bilateral cochlear implantation were included.
Data extraction: Of the 31 articles meeting criteria, usable QOL data were available for 16 articles (n = 355 bilateral CI recipients).
Data synthesis: Standardized mean difference (Δ) for each measure and weighted effects were determined. Meta-analysis was performed for all QOL measures and also independently for hearing/CI-specific QOL and HRQOL.
Conclusion: When measured using hearing/CI-specific QOL instruments, patients reported very large improvements in QOL comparing before cochlear implantation to bilateral CI (Δ=2.07 [1.76-2.38]) and medium improvements comparing unilateral CI to bilateral CI (Δ=0.51 [0.32- 0.71]). Utilization of parallel versus crossover study design did not impact QOL outcomes (χ = 0.512, p = 0.47). No detectable improvements were observed in either CI transition when using HRQOL instruments (no CI to bilateral CI: Δ=0.40 [-0.02 to 0.81]; unilateral CI to bilateral CI: Δ=0.22 [-0.02 to 0.46]).The universal nature of HRQOL instruments may render them insensitive to the medium to large QOL improvements reported by patients using hearing/CI-specific QOL instruments. Given that HRQOL instruments are used to determine the economic benefit of health interventions, these measurement differences suggest that the health economic value of bilateral cochlear implantation has been underestimated.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults.Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(2):61-75. doi: 10.1159/000508433. Epub 2020 Jul 10. Audiol Neurootol. 2021. PMID: 32653882
-
Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):925-932. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1585. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32857114 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):982-990. doi: 10.1002/lary.26738. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 28731538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018 Oct 24;18(6):1-139. eCollection 2018. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018. PMID: 30443278 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hybrid cochlear implantation: quality of life, quality of hearing, and working performance compared to patients with conventional unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3599-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4690-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28762045
Cited by
-
Making the Case for Research on Disease-Modifying Treatments to Tackle Post-lingual Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 21;11:290. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00290. eCollection 2020. Front Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32373054 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implantation in unilateral hearing loss: impact of short- to medium-term auditory deprivation.Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 9;17:1247269. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1247269. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37877013 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear implants.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Apr;281(4):1735-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08285-2. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37924365
-
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 36082873 Free PMC article.
-
Best Practices in the Development, Translation, and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Hearing Impairment: Lessons From the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Instruments.Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 24;15:718416. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.718416. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34899153 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McDermott HJ, Lech M, Kornblum MS et al. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:2314–25. - PubMed
-
- Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A et al. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:649–57. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical