Efficacy and safety of sustained-release oxycodone compared with immediate-release morphine for pain titration in cancer patients: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (SOCIAL)
- PMID: 31192908
- PMCID: PMC6587615
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015505
Efficacy and safety of sustained-release oxycodone compared with immediate-release morphine for pain titration in cancer patients: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (SOCIAL)
Abstract
Background: The study aims to investigate the effect and safety of sustained-release oxycodone hydrochloride as background dose on pain titration in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain.
Material and methods: Adult patients scheduled with a regular strong opioid for cancer-related pain were recruited and randomly assigned to sustained-release oxycodone group (tablets, 12 hourly) and immediate-release morphine group (5 mg initially, hourly). All patients were hourly reassessed for efficacy and dose titration.
Results: The primary end point was the number of titration cycles required to achieve adequate pain relief (numerical rating scale, NRS ≤ 3). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients achieving adequate pain relief during each cycle, potential predictive factors for titration performance, and side effects. Ninety (94.7%) patients in oxycodone group and 78 (86.7%) patients in morphine group achieved adequate pain control during 1 to 4 cycles of titration. Patients in oxycodone group reached adequate pain control within the first 2 cycles of titration, which was significantly shorter than morphine group wherein the number of titration cycles ranged from 1 to 4 (P = .034). Oxycodone prescription significantly increased the response rate of patients to morphine titration during the first cycle of titration (P = .010). The initial NRS score and oxycodone administration were significantly associated with titration performance. The mild or moderate adverse effects were similar in 2 groups, while severe adverse effects were only identified in morphine group (P = .001).
Conclusion: Use of background sustained-release oxycodone is more efficient and better tolerated on dose titration than immediate-release morphine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Zylla DM, Fulbright J, Pawloski PA, et al. Pain score, analgesic utilization, and patient satisfaction among cancer patients at a community cancer center. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings; 2014:203.
-
- Zhang WZ, Yu WJ, Zhao XL, et al. Pharmacoeconomics evaluation of morphine, MS contin and oxycodone in the treatment of cancer pain. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:8797–800. - PubMed
-
- Radbruch L, Nauck F. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC). Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations. Schmerz 2002;16:186–93. - PubMed
-
- Klepstad P, Kaasa S, Jystad A, et al. Immediate- or sustained-release morphine for dose finding during start of morphine to cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind trial. Pain 2003;101:193–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
