Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 22:15:100893.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100893. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Randomized controlled trial of centralized vaccine reminder/recall to improve adult vaccination rates in an accountable care organization setting

Affiliations

Randomized controlled trial of centralized vaccine reminder/recall to improve adult vaccination rates in an accountable care organization setting

Laura P Hurley et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Our objectives were to assess 1) effectiveness of using Colorado's Immunization Information System (CIIS) to send out vaccine reminder/recalls (R/Rs) centrally vs. usual care for adult vaccine delivery within an accountable care organization (ACO) and 2) practice staff's perception of centralized R/R. From 9/2016 to 4/2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among adults enrolled in a Medicaid ACO at six healthcare entities. Adults were divided into two strata: 15,153 age 19-64 and 616 age 65+. Adults age 19-64 who needed influenza and/or Tdap vaccine, and adults age 65+ who needed influenza, and/or Tdap, and/or a pneumococcal vaccine were randomized to receive up to 3 R/Rs by autodialed telephone and mail or usual care. Documentation of receipt of any needed vaccines in CIIS within six months was the primary outcome. We assessed intervention effectiveness using mixed effect logistic regression. Thirteen semi-structured exit interviews were conducted with staff from each healthcare entity. The intervention was not associated with the primary outcome for the age 19-64 population [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98-1.15)] or age 65+ population [(OR 0.96 (0.69-1.32)]. Practice staff perceived the intervention to be beneficial and not burdensome. Perceived barriers included lack of availability of appointments and adults receiving only influenza vaccine when other vaccines were needed. In conclusion, centralized R/R was not effective at improving adult vaccination rates in a Medicaid ACO. Future studies should consider better harmonizing vaccine centralized R/Rs with vaccine delivery efforts within the practice setting. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02133391.

Keywords: Accountable care organization; Adult; Clinical trial; Influenza vaccines; Pertussis vaccine; Pneumococcal vaccines; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram: adult vaccine reminder/recall trial, regional accountable care organization population, 2017. Note: No participants were lost to follow-up. All patients were included in the analysis. ACO, accountable care organization. UTD, up to date.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receipt of vaccines among those who needed a vaccine, adult vaccine reminder/recall trial, regional accountable care organization, 2017*.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IISAR Data Participation Rates. 2016. 2016 ADULT participation table and map.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/annual-report-iisar/2016-data....
    1. Albert S.M., Nowalk M.P., Yonas M.A., Zimmerman R.K., Ahmed F. Standing orders for influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination: correlates identified in a national survey of U.S. Primary care physicians. BMC Fam. Pract. 2012;13:22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman D., Frist W.H. Medicare and medicaid at 50 years: perspectives of beneficiaries, health care professionals and institutions, and policy makers. Jama. 2015;314(4):384–395. - PubMed
    1. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Third edition. SAGE; Los Angeles: 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.
    1. Elo S., Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. - PubMed

Associated data