Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Mild Diabetes Mellitus Following Treatment With Pioglitazone: Reports of a Randomised Trial From The Japan Working Group for the Assessment Whether P ioglitazone P rotects DM Patients A gainst R e-Infarction (PPAR Study)
- PMID: 31193597
- PMCID: PMC6537525
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.09.006
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Mild Diabetes Mellitus Following Treatment With Pioglitazone: Reports of a Randomised Trial From The Japan Working Group for the Assessment Whether P ioglitazone P rotects DM Patients A gainst R e-Infarction (PPAR Study)
Abstract
Background: Secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is critically important to prevent ischaemic heart failure and reduce social burden. Pioglitazone improves vascular dysfunction and prevents coronary atherosclerosis, mainly via anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects by enhancing adiponectin production in addition to antihyperglycemic effects, thus suggesting that pioglitazone attenuates cardiovascular events in patients with mild (HbA1c levels < 6·5%) diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, we evaluated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular events in patients with both previous MI and mild DM.
Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial, we randomly assigned 630 patients with mild DM with a history of MI to undergo either DM therapy with (pioglitazone group) or without (control group) pioglitazone. DM was diagnosed using the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and mild DM was defined if HbA1c level was < 6·5%. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation caused by acute MI, unstable angina, coronary revascularisation (including percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac bypass surgery), and stroke.
Findings: HbA1C levels were 5·9 and 5·8% (p = 0·71) at baseline and 6·0 and 5·8% (p < 0·01) at 2 years for the control and pioglitazone groups, respectively.The primary endpoint was observed in 14·2% and 14·1% patients in the control and pioglitazone groups during two years (95% confidential interval (CI):0.662-1·526, p = 0·98), respectively; the incidence of MI and cerebral infarction was 0·3% and 2·2% (95%CI: 0·786-32·415, p = 0·09) and 1·0% and 0·3% (95%CI: 0·051-3·662, p = 0·44), respectively. Post-hoc analyses of the 7-year observation period showed that these trends were comparable (21·9% and 19·2% in the control and pioglitazone groups, 95%CI: 0.618-1·237, p = 0·45).
Interpretation: Pioglitazone could not reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with mild DM and previous MI.
Keywords: Blood glucose-lowering; Cardiovascular events; Diabetes mellitus; Myocardial infarction; PROBE study; Pioglitazone.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1279-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16214598 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction: results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) Study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 1;49(17):1772-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.048. Epub 2007 Apr 16. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17466227 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Dec;5(12):951-964. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30327-3. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017. PMID: 29079252 Clinical Trial.
-
[Evidences demonstrating the effects of anti-atherosclerotic actions of pioglitazone--special emphasis on PROactive Study and PERISCOPE Study].Nihon Rinsho. 2010 Feb;68(2):235-41. Nihon Rinsho. 2010. PMID: 20158090 Review. Japanese.
-
Thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes: a cardiology perspective.Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1466-74. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K666. Epub 2008 Sep 2. Ann Pharmacother. 2008. PMID: 18698014 Review.
Cited by
-
Tackling Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Does Baseline Glucose Control Matter?EClinicalMedicine. 2018 Nov 27;4-5:6-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.11.006. eCollection 2018 Oct-Nov. EClinicalMedicine. 2018. PMID: 31193560 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 May 18;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01294-7. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. PMID: 34006325 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ambrosy A.P., Fonarow G.C., Butler J. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1123–1133. - PubMed
-
- Jessup M., Brozena S. Heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):2007–2018. - PubMed
-
- Braunwald E., Bristow M.R. Congestive heart failure: fifty years of progress. Circulation. 2000;102(20 Suppl 4):Iv14–23. - PubMed
-
- Dickstein K., Kjekshus J. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):752–760. - PubMed
-
- Levy D., Kenchaiah S., Larson M.G. Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(18):1397–1402. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources