Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):e01855.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01855. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Genotypic evaluation of twenty-eight high- and low-cyanide cassava in low-land tropics, southeast Nigeria

Affiliations
Review

Genotypic evaluation of twenty-eight high- and low-cyanide cassava in low-land tropics, southeast Nigeria

Emmanuel Ukaobasi Mbah et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

A two-year field experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with two replications in 2015/16 and 2016/17 cropping seasons at the National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike (05° 29'N; 07° 33'E; 122 m above sea level) in Nigeria. The objectives of the study were to assess growth, disease status and yield responses of twenty-eight (28) newly developed high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes in low-land humid tropics of Umudike, Nigeria. Plant height, stem girth, canopy diameter, number of leaves/plant, cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava bacterial blight (CBB) incidence and severity as well as bulking rate and fresh root yield varied significantly (P < 0.05) amongst the high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes in both cropping seasons. Also, the results showed that bitter cassava genotypes exhibited greater tolerance to CMD than sweet cassava. However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in bulking rate and fresh root yield between the two groups. The Pearson's and Spearman's ranked associations between fresh root yield of the cassava genotypes and other variables analysed across the two cropping seasons were highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) and positive contrary to the other variables. However, they exhibited different degrees of associations amongst themselves, especially CMD incidence that indicated highly significant and positive association with severity. The principal component analysis across the two cropping seasons indicated eigen-values of the four axes > unity with cumulative variance of 68.98 %. Most of the characters that contributed to the 22.35 % observed variability in principal component (PC1) were CMD incidence and severity, and number of leaves/plant while PC2 also exhibited high vector load from plant attributes such as number of leaves/plant, bulking rate ha-1 and canopy diameter. The bi-plot clustering indicated that genotypes (BI-56, NR110439 and B1-29) exhibited strong similarity amongst themselves across the tested variables. The combined fresh root yield sequence of the first ten high yielder genotypes was in the order: NR110439 > TMS010354 > NR110315 > NR 110238 > NR 110228 > NR 060169 > BI-117 > BI-50 > NR110084 > NR 110181. These cassava genotypes were considered to be better endowed genetically, hence their improvement can be encouraged to ensure high and sustainable root yield. A poly-linear and positive regression was recorded between CMD and root yield as well as between CBB and root yield indicating that they affected fresh root yield of high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes and demands attention also in cassava improvement studies.

Keywords: Agriculture; Ecology; Plant biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Principal component bi-plot of PCA 1 against PCA 2 indicating the clustering of the twenty-eight high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes and the ten attributes measured across the two (2015/16 and 2016/17) cropping seasons. Trait-standardized PCA. PH. Plant height (cm), SG. stem girth (cm), CD. canopy diametre (cm), NLVS PLT. number of leaves/plant, BR. bulking rate (kg−1·day−1 ha-1), RT YLD. fresh root yield (Mt∙ha−1), CBBINC. cassava bacterial blight incidence (%), CBBSV. cassava bacterial blight severity (Scale 1–5), CMDINC. cassava mosaic disease incidence (%), CMDSV. cassava mosaic disease severity (Scale 1–5).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Relationship between cassava mosaic disease severity (b) and fresh root yield (Mt∙ha−1) of twenty-eight high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes with quadratic regression lines, and relationship between cassava bacteria blight incidence (c), severity (d) and fresh root yield (Mt∙ha−1) of twenty-eight high- and low-cyanide cassava genotypes with quadratic regression lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams C., Murrieta R., Siquerra A., Neves W., Sanches R. 2009. Bread of the Land: the Invisibility of Manioc in the Amazon. Amazon Peasant Societies in the Changing Environment; pp. 281–305.
    1. Adepoju O.T., Adekola Y.G., Mustapha S.O., Ogunola S.I. Effect of processing methods on nutrient retention and contribution of local diets from cassava (Manihot spp) to nutrient intake of nigerian consumers. Afri. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. (AJFAND) 2010;10(2):2099–2111.
    1. Afuape S.O.1., Okocha P., Njoku D.1. Multivariate assessment of the agro-morphological variability and yield components among sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) landraces. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2011;5(2):123–132.
    1. Akely P.M.T., Amani N.G., Azouma O., Nindjin C. Proceedings of the Actes of Conference on Potentiel de Transformation du Manioc en Afrique de l’Oeust. Abidjan; Côte d’Ivoire: 2007. Effect of squeezing force of fermented cassava mash (Manihot esculenta CRANTZ) on Attiéké physico-chemical and sensory qualities; pp. 150–153.
    1. Allen E.J., Scott R.K. An analysis of growth of the potato crop. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge. 1980;94:583–606.