Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 13;15(6):e1008202.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008202. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Exploring various polygenic risk scores for skin cancer in the phenomes of the Michigan genomics initiative and the UK Biobank with a visual catalog: PRSWeb

Affiliations

Exploring various polygenic risk scores for skin cancer in the phenomes of the Michigan genomics initiative and the UK Biobank with a visual catalog: PRSWeb

Lars G Fritsche et al. PLoS Genet. .

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are designed to serve as single summary measures that are easy to construct, condensing information from a large number of genetic variants associated with a disease. They have been used for stratification and prediction of disease risk. The primary focus of this paper is to demonstrate how we can combine PRS and electronic health records data to better understand the shared and unique genetic architecture and etiology of disease subtypes that may be both related and heterogeneous. PRS construction strategies often depend on the purpose of the study, the available data/summary estimates, and the underlying genetic architecture of a disease. We consider several choices for constructing a PRS using data obtained from various publicly-available sources including the UK Biobank and evaluate their abilities to predict not just the primary phenotype but also secondary phenotypes derived from electronic health records (EHR). This study was conducted using data from 30,702 unrelated, genotyped patients of recent European descent from the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI), a longitudinal biorepository effort within Michigan Medicine. We examine the three most common skin cancer subtypes in the USA: basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Using these PRS for various skin cancer subtypes, we conduct a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) within the MGI data to evaluate PRS associations with secondary traits. PheWAS results are then replicated using population-based UK Biobank data and compared across various PRS construction methods. We develop an accompanying visual catalog called PRSweb that provides detailed PheWAS results and allows users to directly compare different PRS construction methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRS-PheWAS in MGI and UKB phenomes.
The horizontal line indicates phenome-wide significance. Phenome-wide significant traits are indicated by PheCodes with their description listed below. Directional triangles indicate whether a phenome-wide significant trait was positively (pointing up) or negatively (pointing down) associated with the PRS.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Overlap between the three skin cancer trait loci.
Reported risk SNPs within 1 Mb were merged into the same locus. Loci that were also reported to be associated with skin tanning ability are highlighted in bold. Loci were named according to the closest RefSeq genes (except M1CR a 385 kb locus with 16 RefSeq genes and HV745896 named after a nearby, uncurated mRNA sequence).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Example view from PRSweb (see web resources).
A selection menu on top allows selection of PRS constructs and phenome while interactive plots with “PheWAS results” and “Exclusion PheWAS results” are generated after selection. “Associations between PRS and Selected Phenotype” plots are generated after clicking on a triangle in the PheWAS plots. Detailed summary statistics for each trait association are provided in mouseover elements (shown in grey). Underlying weights of a selected PRS can be downloaded via bottons below the plots (blue).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, Gil L, Hall P, Hastings E, et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D896–D901. Epub 2016/12/03. 10.1093/nar/gkw1133 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wray NR, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res. 2007;17(10):1520–8. Epub 2007/09/06. 10.1101/gr.6665407 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, Haas ME, Roselli C, Choi SH, et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet. 2018;50(9):1219–24. Epub 2018/08/15. 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fritsche LG, Gruber SB, Wu Z, Schmidt EM, Zawistowski M, Moser SE, et al. Association of Polygenic Risk Scores for Multiple Cancers in a Phenome-wide Study: Results from The Michigan Genomics Initiative. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(6):1048–61. Epub 2018/05/22. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.001 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Docherty AR, Moscati A, Dick D, Savage JE, Salvatore JE, Cooke M, et al. Polygenic prediction of the phenome, across ancestry, in emerging adulthood. Psychol Med. 2017:1–10. Epub 2017/11/28. 10.1017/S0033291717003312 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types