Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218280.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218280. eCollection 2019.

Are Prostate Specific-Antigen (PSA) and age associated with the risk of ISUP Grade 1 prostate cancer? Results from 72 996 individual biopsy cores in 6 083 men from the Stockholm3 study

Thorgerdur Palsdottir  1 , Tobias Nordström  1   2 , Markus Aly  1   3 , Johan Lindberg  1 , Mark Clements  1 , Lars Egevad  4 , Henrik Grönberg  1   5 , Martin Eklund  1
Affiliations

Are Prostate Specific-Antigen (PSA) and age associated with the risk of ISUP Grade 1 prostate cancer? Results from 72 996 individual biopsy cores in 6 083 men from the Stockholm3 study

Thorgerdur Palsdottir et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Knowledge about the relationship between PSA, age and ISUP grade group (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer can improve clinical and biological understanding of prostate cancer. We aimed to investigate the associations between PSA and age and the risk of ISUP 1 and ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancer, respectively.

Methods: We included 6 083 men aged 50-69 biopsied with a total of 72 996 individual biopsy cores from the prospective and population based Stockholm3 diagnostic study. We computed the risk of ISUP 1 and ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancer and their respective associations with PSA and age. Since lower Gleason grades often are masked by higher grades in the overall Gleason score, we compared associations both for overall Gleason score and for Gleason on individual biopsy cores.

Results: ISUP 1 prostate cancer was not significantly associated with PSA at diagnosis: odds ratios ranged from 0.82 (95%CI: 0.68-1.00) for PSA 3-4 ng/mL, 0.96 (95%CI: 0.79-1.16) for PSA 4-6 ng/mL, 0.95 (95%CI: 0.75-1.21) for PSA 6-10 ng/mL, and 0.92 (95%CI: 0.58-1.45) for PSA 10-15 ng/mL compared with PSA 2-3 ng/mL. Age was not significantly associated with risk of ISUP 1 cancer. This contrasts to the strong relationship between ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancer and its respective associations with PSA and age.

Conclusions: We find no significant association between the risk of ISUP 1 prostate cancer and PSA and age at diagnosis indicating that PSA contribution from ISUP 1 prostate cancer is closer to that of benign prostate tissue than to that of ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare the following competing interests: Henrik Grönberg has five prostate cancer diagnostic related patents pending, has patent applications licensed to Thermo Fisher Scientific, and might receive royalties from sales related to these patents. Martin Eklund is named on four of these five patent applications. Karolinska Institutet collaborates with Thermo Fisher Scientific in developing the technology for the Stockholm3 prostate cancer diagnostic prediction model(1. PROGNOSTIC METHOD FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PROSTATE CANCER. Publication info:WO2014079874 (A1)2014-05-30; 2. METHOD FOR INDICATING A PRESENCE OR NON-PRESENCE OF AGGRESSIVE PROSTATE CANCER, Publication info:WO2014079865 (A1)2014-05-30; 3. METHOD FOR INDICATING A PRESENCE OR NON-PRESENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN INDIVIDUALS WITH PARTICULAR CHARACTERISTICS, Publication info:WO2018141828 (A1)2018-08-09; 4. METHOD FOR DETECTING A SOLID TUMOR CANCER, Publication info: WO2015137870 (A1)2015-09-17; 5. METHOD FOR INDICATING THE PRESENCE OR NON-PRESENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER, Publication info: WO2013172779 (A2)2013-11-21). Other authors declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Forest plots showing the odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the risk of ISUP grade specific outcomes in biopsy.
The reference level is a man with PSA of 2–3 ng/mL and age group 50–54 years and the plot shows the odds ratios comparing these groups to men in the reference level group. A: Overall ISUP grade. B: ISUP grade per biopsy core (all reported ISUP grade groups for 10 to 12 cores of all men).
Fig 2
Fig 2
A: Overall ISUP grade. Overall ISUP grade reported, one grade per man. B: Biopsy core level. Risk of ISUP grade group per 10–12 biopsy cores per man.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ganz P a Barry JM, Burke W Col NF, Corso PS. Annals of Internal Medicine Conference National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: Role of Active Surveillance in the Management of Men With. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Böker A, Kuczyk MA, Kramer MW, Merseburger AS, Krüger K, Imkamp F, et al. True Incidence of Gleason 6 Pathology in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). Adv Ther. Springer Healthcare; 2017;34: 171–179. 10.1007/s12325-016-0450-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Musunuru HB, Yamamoto T, Klotz L, Ghanem G, Mamedov A, Sethukavalan P, et al. Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience. J Urol. 2016;196: 1651–1658. 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.102 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross HM, Kryvenko ON, Cowan JE, Simko JP, Wheeler TM, Epstein JI. Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes? Eur Urol. 2013;64: 1013 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.029 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlson LE, Angen M, Cullum J, Goodey E, Koopmans J, Lamont L, et al. High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2004; 2297–2304. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601887 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances