Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
- PMID: 31195748
- PMCID: PMC6632055
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina55060248
Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Abstract
Background and objectives: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) in most previous studies has used intracorporeal excision of the appendix and needed a longer operative time than multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MLA), although SLA does have the potential benefit of an almost invisible scar within the umbilicus. Some studies have reported that extracorporeal transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) in children took a considerably reduced operative time compared to MLA. We adopted TULAA in adults, adding routine dissection of the peritoneal attachment of the appendix. The aim was to compare the operative outcomes between TULAA and MLA. Materials and Methods: Between March 2013 and January 2016, 770 patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis from 15 to 75 years of age were enrolled retrospectively. The operation was performed as early (EA) and interval appendectomy (IA). Results: Operative time was shorter in the TULAA group than in the MLA group, except for IA. No open conversion occurred in the TULAA group, except one case of ileocecal resection for IA. No intra-abdominal fluid collection was found in the TULAA group. Extended resection (especially partial cecectomy) was performed less frequently in the TULAA group than in the MLA group for IA. Mean postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the TULAA group for uncomplicated appendicitis. When the data of the EA group and the IA group were compared, operative time was significantly shorter in the IA group for both MLA and TULAA. The open conversion rate and the complication rate tended to be lower in the IA group. Confined to IA, the TULAA group tended to have shorter mean initial, postoperative, and total hospital stays. Conclusions: TULAA can be a useful surgical alternative to MLA in adults and young adolescents, because it lacks open conversion and provides both a shorter operative time and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. TULAA is feasible for IA in that it showed a lower rate of extended resection and complications.
Keywords: appendectomy; appendicitis; interval appendectomy; laparoscopic appendectomy; transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;184(7):445. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06286-3. Eur J Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40560237 Review.
-
Outcomes of Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Pediatric Appendicitis in a Single Institution.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1548-1552. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0306. Epub 2018 Aug 8. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018. PMID: 30088968
-
Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: is it worth it?Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5372-5380. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5618-6. Epub 2017 Jun 8. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28597283
-
Comparison of Transumbilical Laparoscopically Assisted Appendectomy to Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):508-512. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000334. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016. PMID: 27801689
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for retrocecal appendicitis: A propensity score-matched study with multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):105925. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105925. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025. PMID: 40740912 Free PMC article.
-
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39498756
-
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-hole laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children by senior pediatric surgeons: a multicenter study from China.Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 10;11:1224113. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1224113. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37492606 Free PMC article.
-
Is Transumbilical Laparoscopic-assisted Appendectomy Better than Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children? A Randomized Controlled Study.J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 May-Jun;30(3):369-376. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_264_24. Epub 2025 Apr 14. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025. PMID: 40406312 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Cureus. 2022 Apr 26;14(4):e24512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24512. eCollection 2022 Apr. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35497086 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources