Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 5;55(6):248.
doi: 10.3390/medicina55060248.

Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Affiliations

Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Seung Gyu Jin et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) in most previous studies has used intracorporeal excision of the appendix and needed a longer operative time than multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MLA), although SLA does have the potential benefit of an almost invisible scar within the umbilicus. Some studies have reported that extracorporeal transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) in children took a considerably reduced operative time compared to MLA. We adopted TULAA in adults, adding routine dissection of the peritoneal attachment of the appendix. The aim was to compare the operative outcomes between TULAA and MLA. Materials and Methods: Between March 2013 and January 2016, 770 patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis from 15 to 75 years of age were enrolled retrospectively. The operation was performed as early (EA) and interval appendectomy (IA). Results: Operative time was shorter in the TULAA group than in the MLA group, except for IA. No open conversion occurred in the TULAA group, except one case of ileocecal resection for IA. No intra-abdominal fluid collection was found in the TULAA group. Extended resection (especially partial cecectomy) was performed less frequently in the TULAA group than in the MLA group for IA. Mean postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the TULAA group for uncomplicated appendicitis. When the data of the EA group and the IA group were compared, operative time was significantly shorter in the IA group for both MLA and TULAA. The open conversion rate and the complication rate tended to be lower in the IA group. Confined to IA, the TULAA group tended to have shorter mean initial, postoperative, and total hospital stays. Conclusions: TULAA can be a useful surgical alternative to MLA in adults and young adolescents, because it lacks open conversion and provides both a shorter operative time and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. TULAA is feasible for IA in that it showed a lower rate of extended resection and complications.

Keywords: appendectomy; appendicitis; interval appendectomy; laparoscopic appendectomy; transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow sheet of total patients. BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); MLA: multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy; TULAA: transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy. (A) The peritoneal attachments to the appendix and cecum were dissected by pulling the appendix to the cephalo-medial direction. (B) The mesoappendix was clamped and divided after the appendix was removed through the transumbilical incision protected by the wound protector.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wei B., Qi C.L., Chen T.F., Zheng Z.H., Huang J.L., Hu B.G., Wei H.B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: A metaanalysis. Surg. Endosc. 2011;25:1199–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohtani H., Tamamori Y., Arimoto Y., Nishiguchi Y., Maeda K., Hirakawa K. Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012;16:1929–1939. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts K.E. True single-port appendectomy: first experience with the "puppeteer technique". Surg. Endosc. 2009;23:1825–1830. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0270-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navarra G., Pozza E., Occhionorelli S., Carcoforo P., Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1997;84:695. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840536. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Remzi F.H., Kirat H.T., Kaouk J.H., Geisler D.P. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal. Dis. 2008;10:823–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources