Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jun 13;19(Suppl 4):608.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6859-1.

Workplace bullying and psychological distress of employees across socioeconomic strata: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Workplace bullying and psychological distress of employees across socioeconomic strata: a cross-sectional study

Caryn Mei Hsien Chan et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: 1Little is known of the extent of workplace bullying in Malaysia, despite its growing recognition worldwide as a serious public health issue in the workplace. Workplace bullying is linked to stress-related health issues, as well as socioeconomic consequences which may include absenteeism due to sick days and unemployment. We sought to examine the prevalence of workplace bullying and its association with socioeconomic factors and psychological distress in a large observational study of Malaysian employees.

Methods: This study employed cross-sectional, self-reported survey methodology. We used the 6-item Kessler screening scale (K6) to assess psychological distress (cutoff score ≥ 13, range 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress). Participants self-reported their perceptions of whether they had been bullied at work and how frequently this occurred. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted with ever bullying and never bullying as dichotomous categories.

Results: There were a total of 5235 participants (62.3% female). Participant ages ranged from 18 to 85, mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD): 33.88 ± 8.83. A total of 2045 (39.1%) participants reported ever being bullied. Of these, 731 (14.0%) reported being subject to at least occasional bullying, while another 194 (3.7%) reported it as a common occurrence. Across all income strata, mean scores for psychological distress were significantly higher for ever bullied employees (M ± SD: 8.69 ± 4.83) compared to those never bullied (M ± SD: 5.75 ± 4.49). Regression analysis indicated significant associations (p < 0.001) between workplace bullying with being female (Adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.44), higher individual income levels of between RM4,000 to RM7,999 (aOR =1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45) and RM8,000 and above (aOR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.56), and psychological distress (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.16).

Conclusions: More than one in three employees reported having experienced workplace bullying, which was found to be specifically associated with being female, drawing a higher income, and greater psychological distress. In general, low individual income was associated with greater psychological distress. However, higher income employees were far more likely to report experiencing workplace bullying. Findings from this study offer relevant insight into the associations between socioeconomic status and psychological distress in workplace bullying.

Keywords: Employee health; K6; Mental health; Psychological distress; Socioeconomic status; Vulnerable populations; Workplace bullying.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsuno K, Kawakami N, Tsutsumi A, Shimazu A, Inoue A, Odagiri Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: a national representative sample in Japan. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinheiro Marcelo, Ivandic Ivana, Razzouk Denise. Mental Health Economics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. The Economic Impact of Mental Disorders and Mental Health Problems in the Workplace; pp. 415–430.
    1. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Workplace bullying: a tale of adverse consequences. Innov in Clin Neurosc. 2015;12(1–2):32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salin D, Notelaers G. The effects of workplace bullying on witnesses: violation of the psychological contract as an explanatory mechanism? Int J Hum Resour Man. 2018;24:1–21. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1443964. - DOI
    1. Al Bir AT, Hassan A. Workplace bullying in Malaysia: an exploratory study. Malaysian Management Review. 2014;49(1):1–8.

Publication types

MeSH terms