Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):743.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7084-7.

Adherence of popular smoking cessation mobile applications to evidence-based guidelines

Affiliations

Adherence of popular smoking cessation mobile applications to evidence-based guidelines

Nikita B Rajani et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Smoking remains one of the major preventable causes of chronic diseases. Considering the promising evidence on the effectiveness of mobile technology for health behaviour change, along with the increasing adoption of smartphones, this review aims to systematically assess the adherence of popular mobile apps for smoking cessation to evidence-based guidelines.

Methods: The United Kingdom Android and iOS markets were searched in February 2018 to identify smoking cessation apps. After screening, 125 Android and 15 iOS apps were tested independently by two reviewers for adherence to the National Institute of Care and Excellence (NICE) Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials and the Five A Guidelines for Smoking Cessation. Pearson chi square tests were run to examine differences between the two operating systems.

Results: A majority of apps across both operating systems had low adherence (fulfils 1-2 out of 5 guidelines) to the Five A Guidelines (65.7%) and low adherence (fulfils 1-3 out of 9 guidelines) to the NICE Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials (63.6%). Only 15% of mobile apps provided information about the benefits of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and even fewer provided information regarding types of NRT products (7.1%) or how to use them (2.1%). In addition, only a minority of apps arrange follow-up appointments or provide additional support to help smokers quit.

Conclusion: Similar to previous mobile app reviews dating back to 2014, our findings show that most mobile apps do not follow existing smoking cessation treatment guidelines, indicating little change regarding the availability of evidence-based mobile apps for smoking cessation in the UK market. Smokers seeking to quit, tobacco control policy makers and software developers need to work together to develop apps that are in line with the latest clinical guidelines and strategies to maximise effectiveness.

Keywords: Cessation guidelines; Mobile applications; Smoking cessation; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Filippos Filippidis is an Associate Editor for BMC Public Health. The rest of the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organisation. (2015) Prevalence of tobacco smoking. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/tobacco/use/en/
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. (2016) United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/united-kingdom (accessed 7th Sept 2018).
    1. Public Health England. (2015) Health matters: smoking and quitting in England. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-smoking-and-qu... (accessed 7th Sept 2018).
    1. Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction. 2004;99(1):29–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00540.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regmi K, Kassim N, Ahmad N, et al. Effectiveness of Mobile apps for smoking cessation: Α review. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 2017;3(12):1–11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types