Infidelity and Its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 31196837
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.011
Infidelity and Its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Infidelity can be facilitated and/or inhibited as a result of interrelations among multilevel contexts. Despite the existence of numerous studies about infidelity, there is no developmental model that considers multilevel contexts of factors associated with infidelity.
Aim: To review published articles addressing factors associated with infidelity and to apply the ecological model to these factors.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychoInfo. Literature search was restricted to articles published in English up to June 2018. All quantitative and full-text studies that addressed associated factors with infidelity were included. This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
Main outcome measures: This article reports a review of the literature on the factors associated with infidelity based on the ecological model.
Results: We retrieved 5,159 titles, of which 82 were qualified after the qualitative synthesis. The Ecological Couples Systems Diagram (ECSD) is proposed as a developmental model similar to Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Systems Model. There was an inconsistency between variables of microsystem and infidelity engagement. However, the results of some studies indicated the impact of demographic factors, personality traits, and sexual information on infidelity, considering partner characteristics. Variables belonging to a mesosystem had a more stable association with infidelity than those from other systems. In addition, the review reveals the complexity of infidelity, associated with following factors: 68.3% (n = 56) of the studies were based on microsystem variables, 48.8% (n = 40) used mesosystem variables, 19.5% (n = 16) used exosystem variables, 26.8% (n = 22) used macrosystem variables, 6.1% (n = 5) used chronosystem variables, and 50% (n = 41) included variables from 2 or more levels.
Clinical implications: The ECSD can be used not only for assessing couple compatibility in premarital counseling, but also for consulting couples who want to have a long-term romantic relationship. As a potential clinical application, therapists can use the ECSD to assess unfaithful clients and their partners, improving the quality of counseling.
Strengths & limitations: This study reveals different environmental layers of various variables related to infidelity. Determining the effect size of variables associated with infidelity was not possible due to the heterogeneity of infidelity assessment tools and test analysis.
Conclusion: Apparently, incompatibility of interpersonal characteristics is more likely associated with infidelity than incompatibility of intrapersonal characteristics. It is important to consider couple compatibility before starting an exclusive relationship, such as marriage, for individuals who intend to maintain a long-term exclusive romantic relationship. Haseli A, Shariati M, Nazari AM, et al. Infidelity and Its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2019;16:1155-1169.
Keywords: Affair; Ecological Model; Extradyadic; Infidelity; Unfaithful.
Copyright © 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Infidelity in heterosexual couples: demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex.Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Oct;40(5):971-82. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Arch Sex Behav. 2011. PMID: 21667234
-
Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0576-3. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Arch Sex Behav. 2016. PMID: 26194971
-
Once a Cheater, Always a Cheater? Serial Infidelity Across Subsequent Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Nov;46(8):2301-2311. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1018-1. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2017. PMID: 28785917 Free PMC article.
-
What is Infidelity? A Vignette Study on Norms and Attitudes toward Infidelity.J Sex Res. 2023 Oct;60(8):1090-1099. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2104194. Epub 2022 Aug 3. J Sex Res. 2023. PMID: 35920802 Review.
-
Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053904. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36900915 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women in the gynecological setting.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 May;43(5):417-424. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731410. Epub 2021 Jun 28. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 34182585 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sexual satisfaction and attitude toward marital infidelity among married people in Iran: the role of social media and entertainment preferences.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):1693. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19073-w. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38918725 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting postpartum female sexual interest/arousal disorder via adiponectin and biopsychosocial factors: a cohort-based decision tree study.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 27;15(1):27354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12025-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40717115 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual Orientation and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315659. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36497734 Free PMC article.
-
The interplay of attachment styles and marital infidelity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 3;10(1):e23261. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23261. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38163207 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials