Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;34(11):2586-2591.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04860-8. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research

Affiliations
Review

Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research

Arabella L Simpkin et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Discussing the uncertainty associated with a clinical decision is thought to be a critical element of shared decision-making. Yet, empirical evidence suggests that clinicians rarely communicate clinical uncertainty to patients, and indeed the culture within healthcare environments is often to equate uncertainty with ignorance or failure. Understanding the rationale for discussion of uncertainty along with the current evidence about approaches to communicating and managing uncertainty can advance shared decision-making as well as highlight gaps in evidence. With an increasing focus on personalized healthcare, and advances in genomics and new disease biomarkers, a more sophisticated understanding of how to communicate the limitations and errors that come from applying population-based, epidemiologic findings to predict individuals' futures is going to be essential. This article provides a narrative review of studies relating to the communication of uncertainty, highlighting current strategies together with challenges and barriers, and outlining a framework for future research.

Keywords: communication; decision-making; doctor-patient relationships; medical education; patient-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Comment in

  • The Bearable Lightness of Uncertainty.
    Davis DLF, Chou CL. Davis DLF, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2293-2294. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05191-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31512186 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating Uncertainty - The Next Medical Revolution? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1713–5. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong K. If You Can’t Beat It, Join It: Uncertainty and Trust in Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018. - PubMed
    1. Hillen MA, Gutheil CM, Strout TD, Smets EMA, Han PKJ. Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2017;180:62–75. - PubMed
    1. Smithson M. Conflict Aversion: Preference for Ambiguity vs Conflict in Sources and Evidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999;79(3):179–98. - PubMed
    1. Han PK, Klein WM, Arora NK. Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(6):828–38. - PMC - PubMed