Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes in patients treated with dual or triple antithrombotic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31198930
- DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz021
Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes in patients treated with dual or triple antithrombotic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims: The combination of oral anticoagulation with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a high bleeding risk. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with omission of aspirin is a promising option to reduce bleedings, but carries a yet unknown risk of ischaemic events. We therefore sought to systematically review and analyse randomized controlled trials investigating DAT vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) in patients with AF following PCI and/or acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methods and results: We included four trials with overall 9317 patients (5039 DAT, 4278 TAT) in our analysis. Dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a significant reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.65; P = 0.0001], while the composite trial-defined ischaemic endpoint did not differ significantly between DAT and TAT (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.22; P = 0.88). There was also no difference regarding the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.92-1.46; P = 0.21) or stent thrombosis (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69-2.26; P = 0.46). Absolute numbers for MI were 131/4278 (3.1%) with TAT and 182/5039 (3.6%) with DAT, and for stent thrombosis 32/4278 (0.75%) and 52/5039 (1%), respectively. A post hoc power calculation based on the size and event rate of this meta-analysis revealed 80% power to detect a 37% and 100% increase in MI and stent thrombosis, respectively.
Conclusion: Dual antithrombotic therapy significantly reduces bleedings compared with TAT and seems to have a similar effect in preventing ischaemic endpoints in AF patients post-PCI or ACS. Future investigations are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high risk of ischaemic outcomes.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Antithrombotic therapy; Atrial fibrillation; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;96(2):E102-E109. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28535. Epub 2019 Nov 11. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31713326 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Rationale of the RE-DUAL PCI Trial: A Prospective, Randomized, Phase 3b Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy With Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Warfarin Triple Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Have Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting.Clin Cardiol. 2016 Oct;39(10):555-564. doi: 10.1002/clc.22572. Epub 2016 Aug 26. Clin Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27565018 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intracranial haemorrhages vs. stent thromboses with direct oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet agent or triple antithrombotic therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in atrial fibrillation and percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome patients.Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):538-546. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz345. Europace. 2020. PMID: 31942971
-
Safety and efficacy of double vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a collaborative meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-based randomized clinical trials.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Apr 9;7(FI1):f50-f60. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa116. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021. PMID: 33119069 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of Stroke vs. Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Dual vs. Triple Antithrombotic Therapy.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Apr;30(4):105654. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105654. Epub 2021 Feb 10. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 33578352
Cited by
-
[ESC guidelines 2020: acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation : What is new?].Herz. 2021 Feb;46(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-05002-1. Herz. 2021. PMID: 33236199 Review. German.
-
Antithrombotic Therapy With Ticagrelor in Atrial Fibrillation Subjects After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 12;8:745549. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.745549. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34712714 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic impact of left ventricular thrombus resolution after acute coronary syndrome and risk modulation via antithrombotic treatment strategies.Clin Cardiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1692-1699. doi: 10.1002/clc.23741. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Clin Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34664732 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with or without Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 9;11(10):1013. doi: 10.3390/jpm11101013. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 34683155 Free PMC article.
-
Oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation following acute myocardial infarction: A narrative review.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1046298. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1046298. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36407466 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous