Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 30;21(6):e12149.
doi: 10.2196/12149.

Adolescent Perspectives on the Use of Social Media to Support Type 1 Diabetes Management: Focus Group Study

Affiliations

Adolescent Perspectives on the Use of Social Media to Support Type 1 Diabetes Management: Focus Group Study

Faisal S Malik et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: A majority of adolescents report the use of some form of social media, and many prefer to communicate via social networking sites. Social media may offer new opportunities in diabetes management, particularly in terms of how health care teams provide tailored support and treatment to adolescents with diabetes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of adolescents with type 1 diabetes on the feasibility of social media use as a tool to collaboratively manage their diabetes with their diabetes care team.

Methods: Focus groups of adolescents with type 1 diabetes were conducted in the Seattle metropolitan area in Washington State. Semistructured questions were used to elicit views around the preferred means of communication with the adolescents' diabetes care team, how to best support diabetes self-management, and how social media could be used outside of the clinic setting by the diabetes care team to engage with adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was carried out, and emergent themes were subsequently mapped onto 4 domains of feasibility, which included acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality.

Results: Participants included 45 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (mean age 15.9, SD 1.7 years; 58% male; diabetes duration mean 6.2, SD 3.6 years; 76% on insulin pumps; 49% wore continuous glucose monitors; 93% reported use of social media; 84% used smartphones as the primary means for social media access). A total of 7 major topics were identified and mapped onto areas consistent with our focus on feasibility. For acceptability and demand, participants expressed how communication over social media could help facilitate (1) improved communication outside of clinic visits to optimize diabetes management, (2) independence in diabetes self-management, (3) connection to other youth with diabetes for additional diabetes support, and (4) delivery of more timely and personalized care. Addressing implementation and practicality, participants shared the need to (1) ensure patient privacy, (2) maintain professional nature of provider-patient relationship, and (3) recognize that social media is not currently used for medical care by youth with diabetes.

Conclusions: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes expressed interest in the use of social media as a tool to support diabetes management and increase engagement with their diabetes care team. Specific implementation measures around privacy and professionalism should be considered when developing a social media intervention to facilitate communication between adolescents and care teams.

Keywords: adolescents; qualitative research; social media; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key feasibility domains for social media use with diabetes care team.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, Clements MA, Rickels MR, DiMeglio LA, Maahs DM, Tamborlane WV, Bergenstal R, Smith E, Olson BA, Garg SK. State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66–72. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0384. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Datye K, Moore D, Russell W, Jaser S. A review of adolescent adherence in type 1 diabetes and the untapped potential of diabetes providers to improve outcomes. Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Aug;15(8):51. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0621-6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26084580 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryden K, Peveler R, Stein A, Neil A, Mayou R, Dunger D. Clinical and psychological course of diabetes from adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2001 Sep;24(9):1536–40. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.9.1536. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rausch J, Hood K, Delamater A, Shroff Pendley Jennifer, Rohan J, Reeves G, Dolan L, Drotar D. Changes in treatment adherence and glycemic control during the transition to adolescence in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1219–24. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2163. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22474040 dc11-2163 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hausmann J, Touloumtzis C, White M, Colbert J, Gooding H. Adolescent and young adult use of social media for health and its implications. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jun;60(6):714–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.12.025. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28259620 S1054-139X(17)30026-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types