Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 13;20(12):2888.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20122888.

Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations

Affiliations
Review

Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations

Julia Jansing et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The advent of precise genome-editing tools has revolutionized the way we create new plant varieties. Three groups of tools are now available, classified according to their mechanism of action: Programmable sequence-specific nucleases, base-editing enzymes, and oligonucleotides. The corresponding techniques not only lead to different outcomes, but also have implications for the public acceptance and regulatory approval of genome-edited plants. Despite the high efficiency and precision of the tools, there are still major bottlenecks in the generation of new and improved varieties, including the efficient delivery of the genome-editing reagents, the selection of desired events, and the regeneration of intact plants. In this review, we evaluate current delivery and regeneration methods, discuss their suitability for important crop species, and consider the practical aspects of applying the different genome-editing techniques in agriculture.

Keywords: base editors; oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis; precision breeding; programmable nucleases; sequence-specific nucleases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors R.F., A.S. and S.S have received grants from Dow AgroSciences on zinc finger nucleases. The funders had no role in the design of the work, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish it.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of genome-editing tools, the possible genetic outcomes in each case, and examples of crop traits generated using these tools. The colored arrows and boxes link published crop trait examples with the associated genome-editing tool and outcome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representation of the relationships between genome-editing tools, delivery methods, and outcomes. The figure shows which tools can be delivered as DNA, RNA, RNPs, or proteins, and which delivery methods are suitable for each cargo type. It also indicates which cargo and delivery methods are available for stable transformation and transient expression, and categorizes them according to the use of nucleic acids (which is relevant for the regulatory assessment of generated plants). The sizes of the shapes are intended to promote visual clarity and do not indicate any relative importance among the methods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hiom K. Coping with DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair. 2010;9:1256–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puchta H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: Mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 2005;56:1–14. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gorbunova L. How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand break repair. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4:263–269. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01430-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sander J.D., Dahlborg E.J., Goodwin M.J., Cade L., Zhang F., Cifuentes D., Curtin S.J., Blackburn J.S., Thibodeau-Beganny S., Qi Y., et al. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA) Nat. Method. 2011;8:67–69. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1542. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guilinger J.P., Pattanayak V., Reyon D., Tsai S.Q., Sander J.D., Joung J.K., Liu D.R. Broad specificity profiling of TALENs results in engineered nucleases with improved DNA-cleavage specificity. Nat. Method. 2014;11:429–435. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources